PubMed · 15915886
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Robert E Horseman. 2005. What's the rush?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15915886/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIM: During clinical usage, scaler tips may become worn and reduced in length. It is unknown what effect wear has on the magnitude of scaler tip vibrations when they are utilized under typical clinical loads. The aim of this investigation was to assess the effect of simulated wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude, using a scanning laser vibrometer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Cavitron SPS (Dentsply) ultrasonic generator and three scaler insert designs (FSI-100, FSI-1000 and FSI-SLI-10S) were selected for the investigation. Tip vibration displacement amplitude was assessed unloaded and then contacting against tooth surfaces with loads of 0.5 and 1.0 N. Tips were then ground down by 1 mm and then 2 mm and scans were repeated. RESULTS: For all tips, load and length were found to be significant variables (p<0.0001). The scaler tips showed a fall in displacement amplitude with a reduction in tip length. However, all scaler tips showed variability in the amount oscillation that occurred. This was most pronounced with FSI-SLI-10S. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation demonstrated that tip wear could affect the performance of dental ultrasonic scaler inserts by reducing their vibration displacement amplitude. Clinicians should be aware of this variability, which may be significant enough to affect clinical procedures.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: Scanning laser vibrometry is a noninvasive method of measuring the velocity, displacement amplitude and oscillation frequency of vibrating objects. The purpose of this study was to assess, using a scanning laser vibrometer (SLV), the performance of different designs of commercially available ultrasonic scaler generators by measuring the oscillatory characteristics of various scaler tips. METHODS: Four ultrasonic generators were tested (Cavitron SPS and Cavitron Select (Dentsply, York, PA, USA) and Piezon Master 400 and Mini Piezon (Electro-Medical Systems, Switzerland)) with various designs of scaler tip. The tips were positioned with their anterior surface perpendicular to the direction of the laser. A graduated scale, placed over the manufacturer's power dial, enabled incremental power setting selection. For each power setting, the laser beam from the SLV was scanned over the surface of the oscillating tip. RESULTS: The ranges of longitudinal displacement amplitudes (in micrometres) were as follows: Mini Piezon (P-tip): 12.90+/-1.44 to 44.03+/-7.80; Piezon Master 400 (P-tip): 16.02+/-2.66 to 35.85+/-5.29; Cavitron SPS (TFI-10 tip): 7.81+/-0.51 to 29.70+/-1.12; Cavitron Select (TFI-10 tip): 13.13+/-1.44 to 33.77+/-4.27; Cavitron SPS (TFI-3 tip): 5.50+/-0.46 to 31.35+/-3.62. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there are differences between commercially available generators and that tip movement varies between tips of the same style as well as between the generator and tip design. Users of ultrasonic scalers should be made aware of this inherent variability that may influence clinical procedures.