PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15922196

Linear programming to optimize performance in a department of surgery.

Michael W Mulholland·Paul Abrahamse·Vinita Bahl
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Linear programming is an analytic method that can be used to develop models for health care that optimize distribution of resources through mathematical means. STUDY DESIGN: The linear programming model contained objective, decision, and constraint elements. The objective was to optimize financial outcomes for both the hospital and physicians in the Department of Surgery. The decision concerns procedure mix or the number of each type of surgical procedure. Constraints apply to resources that are consumed during the course of the patient's surgical encounter. RESULTS: The optimal solution produced an increase in professional payments of 3.6% and an increase in hospital total margin of 16.1%. This solution favored surgical procedures that require inpatient care; these patients had greater comorbidity, reflected in a higher case-mix index of 3.74 compared to 2.97. Substantial differences were noted in use of general care and ICU days, and in consumption of preoperative, intraoperative, and recovery room time. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning quality surgical care with optimal financial performance may be assisted by mathematical models such as linear programming.

Explore related subjects

ComorbidityDiagnosis-Related GroupsInpatientsIntensive Care UnitsModels, TheoreticalProgramming, LinearSurgery Department, HospitalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael W Mulholland, Paul Abrahamse, Vinita Bahl. 2005. Linear programming to optimize performance in a department of surgery.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Assessing the comorbidity between asthma and depression through polygenic risk scoring and time-to-event models.

BACKGROUND: Patients with asthma have an increased risk of developing depression, affecting their quality of life. To date, the processes contributing to this comorbidity remain unclear. METHODS: We integrated two large genome-wide association studies (88,486 patients with asthma and 447,859 controls; 412,024 patients with depression and 1,587,577 controls) with cross-sectional and longitudinal information available from the All of Us Research Program (N = 87,167) through polygenic risk scoring (PRS), Cox proportional-hazards models, one-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), and gene-set and drug-repurposing analyses. RESULTS: We observed that depression PRS was associated with increased asthma risk (hazard ratio, HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.09-1.17), also when accounting for comorbidity status (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12). Conversely, the effect of asthma PRS was null after accounting for comorbidity status. One-sample MR analysis showed an effect of depression genetic liability on asthma, ranging from beta = 0.36 ± 0.03 when considering a linear relationship to beta = 3.21 ± 0.31 when considering possible nonlinear relationships. Conversely, the effect of asthma genetic risk on depression was null after accounting for potential confounders. The gene-set analyses showed that asthma and depression polygenic risks share biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components related to the immune system and the lung-brain axis. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic predisposition contributes to asthma-depression comorbidity through direct effects and shared pathogenic processes. These findings highlight the potential to develop targeted interventions to prevent and treat the co-occurrence of respiratory and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Comorbidity↗