PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15927640

Partial versus complete fundoplication: is there a correct answer?

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder, and patients diagnosed with GERD face a lifelong treatment requirement. A surgical antireflux procedure may be offered as an alternative to lifelong treatment with proton-pump inhibitors. Many investigations have been performed to help discover the best surgical alternative to medical management. An ideal antireflux procedure should be safe, effective, durable, and result in minimal complications. Total fundoplication in the form of Nissen fundoplication is the most widely used antireflux operation worldwide. Although its efficacy is well documented, the clinical success rate in terms of reflux control is occasionally compromised by troublesome mechanical side effects. Because of these unsatisfactory symptoms and continued hindered quality of life, the Nissen fundoplication has undergone many modifications. The current standard appears to be the 2 cm floppy Nissen; however, the alternative approach has been the use of a partial fundoplication, most frequently the Toupet procedure. Both the Nissen and Toupet fundoplications have proven to provide relief in the majority of patients, but each has its own drawback. Patients undergoing Nissen fundoplication have a higher incidence of dysphagia early after operation, although this appears to resolve in most. The Toupet, on the other hand, may not be as durable, and may lead to the early re-emergence of symptoms. The problem of post-Nissen dysphagia led many surgeons to believe that the Nissen night be contraindicated in patients who have dysmotility,because it would cause even greater dysphagia; however, recent articles have not demonstrated this to be the case. It seems that the floppy Nissen performed over a large bougie (56-60 Fr) with division of short gastrics and crural closure is an acceptable operation for reflux in both those who have normal motility and those who have mild to moderate dysmotility. Thus, for most patients who have GERD and normal motility, either procedure appears effective in the majority of patients; however, those patients who have severe dysmotilty disorders and who require an antireflux procedure(ie, scleroderma, postmyotomy achalasia) are likely best served with a partial fundoplication.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Patricia A Limpert, Keith S Naunheim. 2005. Partial versus complete fundoplication: is there a correct answer?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2005.01.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Esophageal motility studies in cirrhotic patients before and after endoscopic variceal ligation].

BACKGROUND: To study esophageal motility before and after the endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with chronic liver disease assisted at the "Gastrocentro - UNICAMP" in the program of endoscopic variceal ligation were studied (mean age of 49.5 years, 19 males and 5 females). The inclusion criteria were chronic liver disease and esophageal varices with high-risk bleeding. Initially upper digestive endoscopy and esophageal manometry were performed in all cases. Next, the sessions of variceal ligation were initiated (average 3.4+/-2.1) in the outpatient clinic, with an interval of 2 to 4 weeks. The esophageal manometry was repeated 4 weeks after variceal eradication and amplitude, duration, propagation speed of the contractile waves and peristalsis were studied. RESULTS: Analysis of the lower sphincter pressure did not show differences before and after variceal ligation. In 10 cases (41.6%) dysmotility was recorded, and the amplitude of the contractile waves rose from 70.7 mmHg (52.3 and 108.4) before variceal ligation to 89.7 mmHg (69.9 and 122.8) after the procedure (p = 0.004 - p < 0.05), and the duration increased from 3.55 seg.+/- 0.58 to 3.90 seg.+/- 0.72 (p = 0.02 - p < 0.05). The wave propagation speed did not differ from the values before the exam of 3.43+/- 0.97 cm/seg, to those after of. 61+/- 0.99 cm/sec (p = 0.15 - p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The final analysis shows alterations of esophageal motility characterized by increase in the amplitude and duration of the contractile waves.

Esophageal Motility Disorders↗

Evaluation of artificial neural networks in the classification of primary oesophageal dysmotility.

OBJECTIVE: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can rapidly analyse large data sets and exploit complex mathematical relationships between variables. We investigated the feasibility of utilizing ANNs in the recognition and objective classification of primary oesophageal motor disorders, based on stationary oesophageal manometry recordings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred swallow sequences, including 80 that were representative of various oesophageal motor disorders and 20 of normal motility, were identified from 54 patients (34 F; median age 59 years). Two different ANN techniques were trained to recognize normal and abnormal swallow sequences using mathematical features of pressure wave patterns both with (ANN(+)) and without (ANN(-)) the inclusion of standard manometric criteria. The ANNs were cross-validated and their performances were compared to the diagnoses obtained by standard visual evaluation of the manometric data. RESULTS: Interestingly, ANN(-), rather than ANN(+), programs gave the best overall performance, correctly classifying >80% of swallow sequences (achalasia 100%, nutcracker oesophagus 100%, ineffective oesophageal motility 80%, diffuse oesophageal spasm 60%, normal motility 80%). The standard deviation of the distal oesophageal pressure and propagated pressure wave activity were the most influential variables in the ANN(-) and ANN(+) programs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ANNs represent a potentially important tool that can be used to improve the classification and diagnosis of primary oesophageal motility disorders.

Esophageal Motility Disorders↗