PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15942835

FP-21399 (Lexigen Pharmaceuticals).

Abstract

Lexigen (formerly Fuji ImmunoPharmaceuticals) is developing FP-21399, a bis-azo compound, for the potential treatment of HIV infections. By March 1998, a phase II clinical study had been initiated to explore the immunologic and virologic activity of the compound. In the phase II study, the compound was being administered once a month for 48 weeks to 40 patients who are failing on protease inhibitor regimens either alone or with the antiretrovirals currently being taken by the patients. In a previous phase II study conducted by the company, researchers observed hints of a cellular immune response in a small subset of subjects at risk for disease progression or development of opportunistic infections [310177]. Phase I clinical trials commenced in the US in 1995 [178794]. In a small 21-patient phase I dose escalation trial of intravenous FP-21399, 13 patients with baseline CD4 cell counts between 50 and 400 received infusions of various doses (1,2 or 3 mg/kg) of the compound once a week for four weeks. The compound was well-tolerated and 9 patients showed an increase in CD4 count of at least 15% over their baseline values, 2 showed a decrease in viral load of 1 log (90%), and 2 went from low viral loads to below the limit of quantification [310771,310177]. FP-21399 has been reported to interfere with the ability of the HIV envelope glycoproteins to use CXCR4 and CCR5 as co-receptors when entering CD4 cells. It concentrates in the lymph nodes, which are important viral reservoirs. In addition, the drug has demonstrated antiviral activity against many clinical and laboratory strains of HIV, including those that are AZT-resistant [310177]. FP-21399 was selected via a screening program of Fuji's compounds developed originally for photographic use. It has been demonstrated, in preclinical studies, that FP-21399 inhibits HIV entry to the target cell by interfering with the V3 loop of the viral envelope. The compound has the advantage that it has lower toxicity than reverse transcriptase inhibitors because it does not enter the cells [178794].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Poli, E Vicenzi. 2001. FP-21399 (Lexigen Pharmaceuticals).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15942835/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗