PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15948293

Enzymatic mutation detection technologies.

Abstract

Mutation is as necessary for life as fidelity is in DNA replication. The study of mutations reveals the normal functions of genes, messages, proteins, the causes of many diseases, and the variability of responses among individuals. Indeed, recent mutations that have not yet become polymorphisms are often deleterious and pertinent to the disease history of afflicted individuals. This review discusses the principles behind a variety of methods for the detection of mutations and factors that should be considered in future methods design. One enzymatic approach in particular using orthologs of the CEL I nuclease that show high specificity for all mismatches, appears to be easy and robust. Further developments of this and other methods will allow mutation detection to become an integral component of individualized medicine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony T Yeung, Deepali Hattangadi, Lauryn Blakesley, Emmanuelle Nicolas. 2005. Enzymatic mutation detection technologies.. https://doi.org/10.2144/05385rv01

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Development of thermodynamic models for simulating probe dissociation profiles in fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Stringency in ribosomal RNA (rRNA)-targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is typically adjusted with formamide, and the optimum formamide concentration at which the probe can hybridize with the target rRNA, but not with rRNAs with mismatches, is to be found experimentally. This is a difficult task when target or closest non-target organisms are not available in pure culture, or when there are numerous non-targets of concern. The objective of this work was to formulate mechanistic models capable of simulating the effect of formamide on probe dissociation. Using a previously described equilibrium model of FISH [Yilmaz and Noguera (2004) Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70(12):7126-7139] as the basis, the effect of formamide on free energy changes of probe-target duplex formation (DeltaG(1)(0)) and folding of target region (DeltaG(3)(0)) was simulated to be linear, and models differing in the definitions of the slopes of these relationships (m(1) and m(3)) were calibrated using experimental dissociation profiles for 27 probes targeting the 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli (E. coli). A good level of predictive power was obtained when m(1) was linearly related to probe length and when m(3) was made proportional to DeltaG(3)(0). The effect of single mismatches on probe dissociation with formamide was also studied, although at a preliminary level. The expected changes in DeltaG(1)(0) with the introduction of mismatches were not sufficient to capture the overall trends of mismatched dissociation profiles. In conclusion, this study offers the first theoretical method to calculate dissociation profiles for perfectly matched probes, and suggests a direction to systematically evaluate the effect of formamide on mismatched probes.

Base Pair Mismatch↗

Mismatch induced speciation in Salmonella: model and data.

In bacteria, DNA sequence mismatches act as a barrier to recombination between distantly related organisms and can potentially promote the cohesion of species. We have performed computer simulations which show that the homology dependence of recombination can cause de novo speciation in a neutrally evolving population once a critical population size has been exceeded. Our model can explain the patterns of divergence and genetic exchange observed in the genus Salmonella, without invoking either natural selection or geographical population subdivision. If this model was validated, based on extensive sequence data, it would imply that the named subspecies of Salmonella enterica correspond to good biological species, making species boundaries objective. However, multilocus sequence typing data, analysed using several conventional tools, provide a misleading impression of relationships within S. enterica subspecies enterica and do not provide the resolution to establish whether new species are presently being formed.

Base Pair Mismatch↗