PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15970138

[Medical communication with immigrant population lacking language fluidity].

Abstract

The Guadalajara University Hospital Study on the quality of communication with immigrant population is a pilot experience that once finished and its success assessed could be extended to other health centers and to others JCCM provinces, and could even coordinate the translation of materials at regional level. Without a doubt the health center would decrease the risk of errors in communication, saving time and consequently money if professionals for increase the process of communication were hired, with quality assurances and materials for the users translated into the most requiered languages, and cultural informative materials for health professionals, all of them areas we are already working on. For the formation of skilled personal, we are working in a pocket guide in several languages; for the user we have an admission guide in Arab and English, protocols and informed consents, as well as informative pamphlets in several languages. The situation has been and is similar in other European countries but measures have been taken or are being taken for paying more attention to linguistic problems. According to our data in Spain no support service for health professionals or for patients is available in this regard, being implied that those involved should resolve the communicative conflicts with effort and time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J de la Morena Fernández, C Valero Garcés. 2005. [Medical communication with immigrant population lacking language fluidity].. https://doi.org/10.1157/13076153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗