PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15989976

Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.

Sarah Lambert·Antony M Carr
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The fidelity of DNA replication is of paramount importance to the maintenance of genome integrity. When an active replication fork is perturbed, multiple cellular pathways are recruited to stabilize the replication apparatus and to help to bypass or correct the causative problem. However, if the problem is not corrected, the fork may collapse, exposing free DNA ends to potentially inappropriate processing. In prokaryotes, replication fork collapse promotes the activity of recombination proteins to restore a replication fork. Recent work has demonstrated that recombination is also intimately linked to replication in eukaryotic cells, and that recombination proteins are recruited to collapsed, but not stalled, replication forks. In this review we discuss the different types of potential replication fork barriers (RFB) and how these distinct RFBs can result in different DNA structures at the stalled replication fork. The DNA structure checkpoints which act within S phase respond to different RFBs in different ways and we thus discuss the processes that are controlled by the DNA replication checkpoints, paying particular attention to the function of the intra-S phase checkpoint that stabilises the stalled fork.

Explore related subjects

DNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationHumansRecombination, GeneticS PhaseJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sarah Lambert, Antony M Carr. 2004-12-10. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2004.10.020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Generation of Interstrand DNA Cross-Links under Conditions of Acid Stress.

Bacteria encounter acid stress under a variety of circumstances. Acid stress induces DNA damage and genomic instability, most directly via acid-catalyzed depurination reactions that generate apurinic (abasic, AP) sites on the deoxyribose phosphate backbone. DNA damage responses are important in bacterial resistance to acids. A recent report provided evidence that a DNA repair glycosylase, AlkX, which is capable of initiating the repair of interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs), contributes to acid resistance by the pulmonary pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii (Kunkle et al. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2024, 121, e2402422121). This suggested the possibility that AP-derived ICLs might contribute to the acid stress in bacteria. This idea is predicated on earlier work showing that AP sites can generate ICLs via reactions of the ring-opened AP aldehyde with the exocyclic amino groups of nucleobases on the opposing strand of duplex DNA (Price, N. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3483). However, it was not clear from previous work whether AP-derived ICLs could be generated under conditions of acid stress. The results reported here provide evidence for ICL formation under conditions of acid stress via a sequential process involving acid-catalyzed depurination followed by cross-linking of the resulting AP site with an adenine residue on the opposing strand of duplex DNA. This supports the possibility that AP-derived interstrand cross-links could contribute to the effects of acid stress in bacteria, and proteins involved in the repair of these lesions could be involved in resistance to acid stress.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2007

Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli.

The observation that mutations in the Escherichia coli genes umuC+ and umuD+ abolish mutagenesis induced by UV light strongly supported the counterintuitive notion that such mutagenesis is an active rather than passive process. Genetic and biochemical studies have revealed that umuC+ and its homolog dinB+ encode novel DNA polymerases with the ability to catalyze synthesis past DNA lesions that otherwise stall replication--a process termed translesion synthesis (TLS). Similar polymerases have been identified in nearly all organisms, constituting a new enzyme superfamily. Although typically viewed as unfaithful copiers of DNA, recent studies suggest that certain TLS polymerases can perform proficient and moderately accurate bypass of particular types of DNA damage. Moreover, various cellular factors can modulate their activity and mutagenic potential.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2007

Treatment of severe male infertility by micromanipulation-assisted fertilization: an update.

In the past 5-10 years the evolution of micromanipulation-assisted fertilization for the treatment of severe male infertility was marked by the introduction of new technical support, refinement of diagnostic methods for the evaluation of sperm developmental potential, and development of new treatment regimens for the newly discovered abnormalities. The new technical support involves the use of non-contact laser technology to assist micromanipulation for fertilization, the evolution of polarized microscopy-based optical systems to non-invasively detect the position of the meiotic spindle in living human oocytes, and the development of high-magnification optical systems for a better morphological selection of spermatozoa to be used for fertilization. Diagnostic approaches were enriched by commercial availability of kits for the analysis of sperm DNA integrity, leading to the definition of sperm nuclear DNA damage as a distinct cause of male infertility, and by the development of tests, based on heterologous ICSI, for detection of sperm failure to activate oocytes. Several treatment options for these conditions have been proposed and are currently being tested in larger-scale trials. Some technical improvement was also achieved in the field of in vitro maturation of germ cells from men with in vivo maturation arrest, but only a modest clinical improvement resulted from their application. As to the risk for the offspring, recent data are rather reassuring. Except for the risk of transmission of genetically based infertility, no straightforward evidence for a health risk derived from these techniques has been provided. Nevertheless, caution is necessary, particularly concerning the eventual increase in genomic-imprinting abnormalities.

DNA Damage↗