PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15990131

Scientific basis for the Precautionary Principle.

Abstract

The Precautionary Principle is based on two general criteria: (a) appropriate public action should be taken in response to limited, but plausible and credible, evidence of likely and substantial harm; (b) the burden of proof is shifted from demonstrating the presence of risk to demonstrating the absence of risk. Not much has been written about the scientific basis of the precautionary principle, apart from the uncertainty that characterizes epidemiologic research on chronic disease, and the use of surrogate evidence when human evidence cannot be provided. It is proposed in this paper that a new scientific paradigm, based on the theory of evolution, is emerging; this might offer stronger support to the need for precaution in the regulation of environmental risks. Environmental hazards do not consist only in direct attacks to the integrity of DNA or other macromolecules. They can consist in changes that take place already in utero, and that condition disease risks many years later. Also, environmental exposures can act as "stressors", inducing hypermutability (the mutator phenotype) as an adaptive response. Finally, environmental changes should be evaluated against a background of a not-so-easily modifiable genetic make-up, inherited from a period in which humans were mainly hunters-gatherers and had dietary habits very different from the current ones.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paolo Vineis. 2005-09-01. Scientific basis for the Precautionary Principle.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Natural radioactivity intake into wheat grown on fertilized farms in two districts of Pakistan.

The use of phosphate fertilizers on agricultural farms enhances gamma-ray activity concentration in the farms and therefore absorbed dose rates to the public. The most common natural radionuclides in fertilizer and soil are (40)K, (226)Ra and (232)Th. Agricultural farms at four locations in two districts in Pakistan consisting of saline and normal soils had been under fertilizer treatment for the past 30, 20, 10 and 0 y, therefore, natural radioactivity has been measured in soil samples from these sites to investigate the effect of fertilizers in soil and wheat grown in these sites. Radioactivity measured in soil of the sites under investigation was 550-644, 20-35 and 42-58 Bq kg(-1) for (40)K, (226)Ra and (232)Th, respectively. Wheat was grown in the farms and radioactivity transferred from soil to roots, shoots and grains was also measured. Relatively high natural radioactivity has been observed in the fertilized agricultural farms and in the wheat plants grown in these farms. From the total amount of an element uptaken in a plant, distribution of the element in different parts of the plant has been studied. The distribution of potassium was almost uniform in roots, shoots and grains of wheat; that of radium was different in the three parts of wheat; and that of thorium was almost equal in shoots and grains but quite large in the roots. Soils to grain transfer factors of the natural radionuclides have been determined as 3-4 x 10(-2) for (226)Ra, 2-3 x 10(-2) for (232)Th and 17-20 x 10(-2) for (40)K. Annual doses of (40)K and (226)Ra received by intake of grain products have been estimated to lie within range while the dose received from intake of (232)Th is larger than the range specified in UNSCEAR report 2000.

Environmental Exposure↗