PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15995938

Repifermin. Human Genome Sciences/GlaxoSmithKline.

Abstract

Human Genome Sciences (HGS) and GlaxoSmithKline (formerly SmithKline Beecham) are developing topical and injectable formulations of repifermin, keratinocyte growth factor-2 (KGF-2), also known as fibroblast growth factor-10 (FGF-10) for the potential treatment of wound care, oral and intestinal mucositis, and inflammatory bowel diseases [385959,396786]. A phase IIb trial of the topical formulation in chronic venous ulcers is ongoing, as well as phase II trials for the systemic, injectable formulation in ulcerative colitis and in the prevention of mucositis after chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation [352908,368013, 385959,404294]. In May 2001, UBS Warburg predicted that HGS would receive approval of repifermin for the treatment of venous ulcers by yearend 2004, mucositis in 2005, and ulcerative colitis in the second half of 2004 [412015]. In October 2000, SmithKline Beecham exercised an option to codevelop repifermin for phase III trials and beyond [385959,399183]. In May 2001, UBS Warburg valued repifermin's worldwide market at 2 billion dollars for treating venous ulcers and predicted sales of 33 million dollars in 2004 and 118 million dollars in 2005 for this indication. In addition, the analysts regarded repifermin as having potential in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers (a market valued at over 1.8 billion dollars) and estimated that the drug might earn another 103.5 million dollars for these indications in 2005. Furthermore, the analysts predicted sales of 6.8 million dollars for repifermin's mucositis indication and, for ulcerative colitis, sales of 27.3 million dollars in 2004 and 54.8 million dollars in 2005. Overall, the analysts estimated that repifermin represented a 3.5 billion dollars market opportunity for HGS/ GlaxoSmthKline and that commercialization of the drug might earn more than 61 million dollars by 2004 [412015].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Wheeler. 2001. Repifermin. Human Genome Sciences/GlaxoSmithKline.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15995938/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗