Case managers' encounters with errors.

TCM Staff

doi:10.1016/j.casemgr.2005.04.001

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15999088

Case managers' encounters with errors.

TCM Staff

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Case managers certainly come across or suspect medical errors. This article offers a glimpse into the variety of mishaps, possible errors, and even moral ambiguities connected with errors that a case manager may experience. The primary objective of the article is simply to give readers an idea of the kinds of error scenarios a case manager may encounter. The cases appearing here are taken from actual accounts.

Explore related subjects

Attitude of Health Personnel Case Management Conflict, Psychological Guideline Adherence Humans Intention Malpractice Medical Errors Patient Advocacy Patient Discharge Practice Guidelines as Topic Safety Management Terminal Care Time Factors Truth Disclosure Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

TCM Staff. Case managers' encounters with errors.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.casemgr.2005.04.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Using enquiry in learning: from vision to reality in higher education.

This paper reports on the contribution of six nurse educators to embed enquiry-led learning in a pre-registration nursing programme. Their focus was to evaluate student and facilitator perspectives of a hybrid model of problem-based learning, a form of enquiry-based learning and to focus on facilitators' perceptions of its longer-term utility with large student groups. Problem-based learning is an established learning strategy in healthcare internationally; however, insufficient evidence of its effectiveness with large groups of pre-registration students exists. Fourth Generation Evaluation was used, applying the Nominal Group Technique and Focus Group interviews, for data collection. In total, four groups representing different branches of pre-registration students (n = 121) and 15 facilitators participated. Students identified seven strengths and six areas for development related to problem-based learning. Equally, analysis of facilitators' discussions revealed several themes related to strengths and challenges. The consensus was that using enquiry aided the development of independent learning and encouraged deeper exploration of nursing and allied subject material. However, problems and frustrations were identified in relation to large numbers of groups, group dynamics, room and library resources and personal development. The implications of these findings for longer-term utility with large student groups are discussed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2006

Attitudes and beliefs of pediatricians and genetic counselors regarding testing and screening for CF and G6PD: implications for policy.

There is wide variability in conditions included in state newborn screening (NBS) panels. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) was commissioned by Health Resources and Services Administration to develop a uniform NBS panel. Based on survey data, the ACMG committee proposed a panel that included cystic fibrosis (CF) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD), although G6PD was excluded from their final recommendations. We examine the attitudes of pediatricians and genetic counselors concerning screening for these two conditions. Data were collected as part of two different studies. Koopmans and Ross surveyed a random sample of 600 pediatricians from four states based on their NBS panels. Hiraki et al. surveyed genetic counselors who were members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) listserv. For this analysis, we compare the health care professionals' (HCPs') attitudes toward a universal NBS program for CF and G6PD, and how their support is influenced by state policy and personal interest in testing their own children. Two hundred twenty-three pediatricians and 267 genetic counselors provided partial or complete responses. Pediatricians are more likely to support NBS for both CF (84%) and G6PD (58%) than genetic counselors (56%, P < 0.001 and 39%, P < 0.001, respectively). Both pediatricians and genetic counselors' attitudes toward screening correlate with interest in screening their own children (P < 0.001). Interest in CF screening also correlates with state policy (pediatricians, P < 0.001; genetic counselors, P < 0.025). The correlation of professional recommendations with state policies and personal preferences reinforces the need for systematic evidence-based reviews rather than reliance on stakeholder opinions for developing national guidelines.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2006

Attitudes of genetic counselors towards expanding newborn screening and offering predictive genetic testing to children.

There is movement to expand newborn screening (NBS) to include conditions that challenge the traditional public health screening criteria. Little is known about the attitudes of genetic counselors towards expanding NBS and offering predictive genetic tests to children. For our study genetic counselors completed an internet survey posted on the National Society of Genetic Counselors Listserv regarding five conditions: cystic fibrosis (CF), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD), fragile X (FraX), and type 1 diabetes (T1D). The survey addressed attitudes towards: (1) testing high-risk infants; (2) mandatory NBS; (3) population screening beyond the newborn period; and (4) testing one's own child. Two hundred sixty-seven usable surveys were received. Over two-thirds of respondents supported testing high-risk infants for all conditions except T1D (22%). CF was the only condition for which there was majority support for both mandatory NBS (56%) and later population screening (60%). For all other conditions, later population screening was preferred over NBS (P <or= 0.01). Genetic counselors were most likely to test their own child for CF (46%) and least likely to test their own child for T1D (6%). For each condition, genetic counselors were more likely to support NBS if they chose to screen their own newborn (P < 0.001). Attitudes towards NBS were not influenced by year of graduation or professional experience. We can conclude that genetic counselors are supportive of targeted testing of high-risk infants. They prefer voluntary population screening with consent to mandatory NBS for conditions that challenge Wilson and Jungner criteria. Their support for NBS correlates with their interest in testing their own children and not with professional experience.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗