PubMed · 1600496
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D W Newling, D McLeod, M Soloway, F Di Silverio, P Smith. 1992-07-01. Distant disease.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19920701)70%3A1%2B%3C365%3A%3Aaid-cncr2820701331%3E3.0.co%3B2-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The authors treated 23 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients with antiandrogen flutamide. Half of the patients were treated with 500 mg, the another part with 750 mg flutamide for three months, and after 3 months brake again for 3 months. The decrease of the residual urine and an increase of the flow were observed. The subjective parameters were improved, too. In some patients side effects (gynecomastia, loss of appetite and potency) were observed. There was no different in the effect of the two doses.
Cancer of the prostate gland is the most frequently occurring malignant lesion in men. Because most prostate cells depend on androgen for growth, removal of testosterone by either orchiectomy or medical castration using diethylstilbestrol or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue is first-line treatment for patients with symptomatic Stage D2 disease. The trend in hormonal therapy has been toward long-acting minimal-dosing high-compliance regimens, capitalizing on the recent availability of the long-acting LHRH analogues, which require only monthly injections to maintain castration levels of testosterone, and the nonsteroidal antiandrogen ICI 176,334, which (in early clinical trials) appears to block intracellular testosterone activity with a once-a-day oral regimen. To eliminate the rapid LH increase that can occur during early agonist therapy, combinations of LHRH analogues and antiandrogens (total androgen blockade) have been tested and appear promising. The effects of hormonal treatment in patients with symptomatic Stage D2 prostate cancer have been studied extensively and are relatively well understood. By contrast, hormonal treatment has not been explored in contemporary randomized Phase III trials of asymptomatic Stage D2, D1, or C disease, localized Stage B or A disease, or before prostate surgery or radiation treatment. Research must continue to determine the optimal regimen that suppresses testosterone activity with the least amount of toxicity.
Complementarity of electrostatic potential surface maps was utilized in defining bioisosteric steroidal androgen receptor antagonists. Semiempirical and ab initio level calculations performed on a series of methanesulfonyl heterocycles indicated the requirement for a partial negative charge at the heteroatom attached to C-3 of the steroid nucleus to attain androgen receptor affinity. Synthesis and testing of six heterocycle A-ring-fused dihydroethisterone derivatives support this hypothesis, and we have identified two new androgen receptor antagonists of this class.