PubMed · 16008205
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Derek Mowbray. 2005-06-23. Performance. The winning formula.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16008205/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in prisons ranges from 12% to 31%. There are generally accepted--albeit still evolving--guidelines for identification and treatment of hepatitis C in the community. However, there is less agreement among health professionals caring for prisoners about best practices for identification, medical management, and treatment of hepatitis C. Inmates often lack health care before incarceration. In prisons, infected persons could be identified and the management of infection initiated; however, the high prevalence of HCV infection among prisoners would impose a disproportionate cost for hepatitis C care on the correctional system. The optimal solution is for prison and public health systems in the United States to jointly provide targeted HCV testing and standard-of-care hepatitis C medical management, treatment, and prevention programs to prison inmate populations. The authors report on a January 2003 meeting of experts in prison health, public health, hepatology, and infectious diseases and explore the clinical care, prevention, and collaboration needed to provide hepatitis C management in prisoners.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: to present recently developed guidelines by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) to guide the ethical conduct of research by midwives across international and culturally diverse communities. To illustrate the complexities of conducting collaborative research across diverse communities, a case study is provided highlighting unequal power balances, legal, ethical and cultural constraints. BACKGROUND: the research guidelines are structured using a human rights framework. The document was developed with input and consideration by the ICM Research Standing Committee and comments of 35 delegates who participated in a workshop to evaluate the guidelines from the perspectives of frontline midwifery clinicians, leaders and researchers. It is intended to serve as a blueprint for midwives aiming to enter into a collaborative research partnership with ethnic and culturally diverse groups. CONCLUSIONS: although the document was developed with the international midwifery community in mind, it will guide any researcher seeking to conduct research in the best interest of women, their newborn babies, their families, and their wider communities.