PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16015110

Recent developments in percutaneous tracheostomy: improving techniques and expanding roles.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an update of recent developments pertaining to the use of percutaneous tracheostomy. Percutaneous tracheostomy has been established as an alternative to open surgical tracheostomy, but many key questions about the optimal use of this procedure remain unanswered. RECENT FINDINGS: Issues in percutaneous tracheostomy that have been addressed in the recent literature include the optimal method, timing, use of percutaneous tracheostomy in emergencies, safety in high-risk populations, confirmation of tracheal puncture, and outcomes. SUMMARY: Recent literature suggests that percutaneous tracheostomy is safe to use in an expanding population of patients, including patients with airway compromise and thrombocytopenia. Several methods seem to be safe alternatives to that originally described. Capnography has arisen as an alternative to bronchoscopy for confirmation of tracheal puncture. Recent evidence highlights that although tracheostomy may improve short-term outcome, these critically ill patients have a significant long-term risk of poor outcome. This must be taken into consideration when this procedure is offered.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Trevor Bardell, John W Drover. 2005. Recent developments in percutaneous tracheostomy: improving techniques and expanding roles.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccx.0000170680.09759.f2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

International emergency medicine: a review of the literature.

The field of international emergency medicine has grown rapidly over the past several decades, with an increase in the number of interested individuals and in the range of topics included under its rubric. One of the greatest obstacles, however, faced by international emergency medicine researchers and practitioners alike remains the lack of a high-quality, consolidated, and easily accessible evidence base of literature. In response to this perceived need, members of the Emergency Medicine Residents' Association International Emergency Medicine Committee, in conjunction with members of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine International Interest Group, embarked on the task of creating a recurring review of international emergency medicine literature. Articles for this first annual review, covering research published in 2005, were selected according to explicit, predetermined criteria that included both methodological quality and perceived impact of the research. It is our hope that this annual review will act as a forum for disseminating best practices, while also stimulating further research in the field of international emergency medicine.

Emergency Medicine↗