PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16027363

NMR data collection and analysis protocol for high-throughput protein structure determination.

Abstract

A standardized protocol enabling rapid NMR data collection for high-quality protein structure determination is presented that allows one to capitalize on high spectrometer sensitivity: a set of five G-matrix Fourier transform NMR experiments for resonance assignment based on highly resolved 4D and 5D spectral information is acquired in conjunction with a single simultaneous 3D 15N,13C(aliphatic),13C(aromatic)-resolved [1H,1H]-NOESY spectrum providing 1H-1H upper distance limit constraints. The protocol was integrated with methodology for semiautomated data analysis and used to solve eight NMR protein structures of the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium pipeline. The molecular masses of the hypothetical target proteins ranged from 9 to 20 kDa with an average of approximately 14 kDa. Between 1 and 9 days of instrument time were invested per structure, which is less than approximately 10-25% of the measurement time routinely required to date with conventional approaches. The protocol presented here effectively removes data collection as a bottleneck for high-throughput solution structure determination of proteins up to at least approximately 20 kDa, while concurrently providing spectra that are highly amenable to fast and robust analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gaohua Liu, Yang Shen, Hanudatta S Atreya, David Parish, Ying Shao, Dinesh K Sukumaran, Rong Xiao, Adelinda Yee, Alexander Lemak, Aneerban Bhattacharya, Thomas A Acton, Cheryl H Arrowsmith, Gaetano T Montelione, Thomas Szyperski. 2005-07-18. NMR data collection and analysis protocol for high-throughput protein structure determination.. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504338102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Detecting changes in financial protection: creating evidence for policy in Estonia.

Ninety-four per cent of the Estonian population is covered by public health insurance, but private expenditure has been increasing quickly both in real terms and as a percentage of total health expenditure. To date, little attention has been given to the impact this could have on the population's financial protection. Out-of-pocket payments, which account for the bulk of the private expenditure in many low- and middle-income countries, can push people into poverty and more generally represent too high a burden for some households. It is therefore very important that governments monitor the impact of out-of-pocket payments on health. Using an example from Estonia, this paper aims to illustrate that, if household budget survey data are available, monitoring a population's financial protection is not a complex undertaking. Further, by combining simple statistical analyses of these data with a good knowledge of a country's health system, it is possible to give a fairly detailed diagnostic of the nature of the population's coverage limitation. This allows for the presentation of easily interpretable results that can raise awareness among policy-makers and help to target adequate policy responses. Using Estonian household budget surveys from 1995, 2001 and 2002, we show that the proportion of households who spend more than 20% of their capacity to pay on health increased from 3.4% in 1995 to 7.4% in 2002 and that in 2002, 1.3% of the population fell into poverty because of health payments. Logistic regression helps in identifying the population most at risk: elderly patients who belong to poor households and spend high amounts on medicines. This study, which can be replicated, did raise awareness among policy-makers about the changes in financial protection over the years in Estonia.

Data Collection↗

Money and mental wellbeing: a longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins.

One of the famous questions in social science is whether money makes people happy. We offer new evidence by using longitudinal data on a random sample of Britons who receive medium-sized lottery wins of between 1000 pounds and 120,000 pounds (that is, up to approximately US$ 200,000). When compared to two control groups -- one with no wins and the other with small wins -- these individuals go on eventually to exhibit significantly better psychological health. Two years after a lottery win, the average measured improvement in mental wellbeing is 1.4 GHQ points.

Data Collection↗