Two-digit comparison: decomposed, holistic, or hybrid?

Tom Verguts; Wendy De Moor

doi:10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.195

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16076067

Two-digit comparison: decomposed, holistic, or hybrid?

Tom Verguts·Wendy De Moor

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We investigate whether two-digit numbers are decomposed for purposes of numerical comparison (e.g., choosing the larger one). Earlier theorists concluded that numbers are processed holistically (Brysbaert, 1995; Dehaene, Dupoux, & Mehler, 1990), or that holistic and decomposed processes operate in parallel (Nuerk, Weger, & Willmes, 2001). In the present experiment, we presented pairs of two-digit numbers with a decade distance of either zero (e.g., 54-57) or one (54-61). If a holistic process contributes to two-digit comparison, there should be an overall distance effect for number pairs with a decade distance of one. On the other hand, if numbers are decomposed and a holistic comparison does not contribute, this overall distance effect should be absent for these number pairs. Evidence is found that, at least in the present task settings, numbers are not compared holistically. The results are interpreted in terms of a recently proposed theory of numerical cognition (Verguts & Fias, 2004; Verguts, Fias, & Stevens, in press).

Explore related subjects

Association Learning Concept Formation Humans Mathematics Problem Solving Psychophysics Reaction Time Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Tom Verguts, Wendy De Moor. 2005. Two-digit comparison: decomposed, holistic, or hybrid?. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.195

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Associative learning and the control of human dietary behavior.

Most of our food likes and disliked are learned. Relevant forms of associative learning have been identified in animals. However, observations of the same associative processes are relatively scarce in humans. The first section of this paper outlines reasons why this might be the case. Emphasis is placed on recent research exploring individual differences and the importance or otherwise of hunger and contingency awareness. The second section briefly considers the effect of learning on meal size, and the author revisits the question of how learned associations might come to influence energy intake in humans.

Association Learning↗

PubMed2007

Network model of decreased context utilization in autism spectrum disorder.

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) demonstrate impaired utilization of context, which allows for superior performance on the "false memory" task. We report the application of a simplified parallel distributed processing model of context utilization to the false memory task. For individuals without ASD, experiments support a model wherein presentation of one word, e.g., ''apple,'' strongly activates the neighboring nodes of closely related words such as ''fruit,'' ''tree,'' whereas in ASD these neighboring nodes are relatively less activated. We demonstrate this model to be consistent with the superior performance on recognition testing on the false memory test, but not on free recall. This may have an anatomic basis in diminished hippocampal neuronal arborization and the abnormal minicolumnar pathology in ASD.

Association Learning↗

PubMed2007

Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream.

To learn a language, speakers must learn its words and rules from fluent speech; in particular, they must learn dependencies among linguistic classes. We show that when familiarized with a short artificial, subliminally bracketed stream, participants can learn relations about the structure of its words, which specify the classes of syllables occurring in first and last word positions. By studying the effect of familiarization length, we compared the general predictions of associative theories of learning and those of models postulating separate mechanisms for quickly extracting the word structure and for tracking the syllable distribution in the stream. As predicted by the dual-mechanism model, the preference for structurally correct items was negatively correlated with the familiarization length. This result is difficult to explain by purely associative schemes; an extensive set of neural network simulations confirmed this difficulty. Still, we show that powerful statistical computations operating on the stream are available to our participants, as they are sensitive to co-occurrence statistics among non-adjacent syllables. We suggest that different learning mechanisms analyze speech on-line: A rapid mechanism extracting structural information about the stream, and a slower mechanism detecting statistical regularities among the items occurring in it.

Association Learning↗