PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16096931

Transgenic antithrombin III (Genzyme).

Abstract

ATIII LLC, a joint venture between Genzyme Transgenics (GTC) and Genzyme General, is developing transgenic recombinant human antithrombin III (rhAT-III) as a potential treatment for sepsis and other disorders involving thrombosis. It is in phase III clinical trials in the US and Europe as an anticoagulant in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). GTC has a license from Behringwerke (Hoechst Marion Roussel; now Aventis Pharma) to develop transgenic AT-III. Behringwerke retains exclusive worldwide marketing rights to the product, but has to purchase its entire supply of transgenic AT-III from GTC [156364]. In March 1997, GTC signed an agreement with SMIG, a joint venture formed by GTC and Sumitomo Metals, under which SMIG has the rights to develop rhAT-III in Asia in return for US dollar 4.4 million in additional funding for the continued transgenic development of rhAT-III. The dollar 4.4 million will be paid upon reaching certain milestones, which GTC expected to complete in 1997 [240202]. In December 1998, US-05843705 was issued covering rhAT-III production in transgenic goats [302263]. In January 2000, the results of the European phase III trial, which were significant in meeting the trial's primary endpoint of reduction in the use of fresh frozen plasma were reported. The trial was also significant in two of three secondary endpoints, maintenance of normal AT-III levels and changes in D-dimer and fibrin monomer [352041,353372]. Three phase III trials were initiated in the second quarter of 1998. Two identical trials, one in Europe and one in the US, evaluated the safety and efficacy of rhAT-III compared to placebo in restoring heparin sensitivity to heparin-resistant patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring CPB. The third trial, in both the US and Europe, will determine whether rhAT-III matches, at equivalent doses, the ability of plasma-derived AT-III to restore heparin sensitivity among heparin-resistant patients undergoing CPB [292235,292861]. Full enrollment onto the US trial was complete by the end of first quarter 2000 [363589], and the companies aim to complete trials and submit a filing by the end of 2000 [353372]. Clinical trials of the proteins in Japan were expected to begin in 1998 [286086].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P K Yeung. 2000. Transgenic antithrombin III (Genzyme).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16096931/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗