PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16097149

[Double kidney transplantation].

Abstract

The incidence of end-stage renal failure has been increasing for many years with a marked elevation of the mean age of kidney transplantation candidates. This situation contrasts with the shortage of kidney transplants. One solution, apart from the development of live donor kidney transplantation, is the use of so-called "borderline" cadavre kidneys. Double kidney transplantation is performed in the context of enlargement of the number of "borderline" donors. A review of the medical literature reporting the experience acquired in double kidney transplantation demonstrates a marked heterogeneity of donor selection criteria between the various teams. Recipients are generally selected from among the oldest patients waiting for transplantation. Double kidney transplantation is not associated with any excess mortality and graft survival and graft function are perfectly satisfactory, ensuring a serum creatinine close to 200 micromol/l at 3 years. These results are obtained at the price of low morbidity. Wound complications are not more frequent than after single kidney transplantation. With the exception of one team, vascular complications are not more frequent, but are even more serious than for single kidney transplantation. Ureteric strictures and fistulas are observed more frequently when the two ureters are reimplanted into a common conduit in the case of homolateral transplantation of the two kidneys. Overall, double kidney transplantation has allowed a 10% increase in the recruitment of "borderline" kidneys by all teams with satisfactory functional results and low morbidity. However, donor and recipient selection criteria for double kidney transplantation need to be more precisely defined to avoid depriving elderly patients of transplantation and to avoid using two kidneys in the same recipient when one kidney would have ensured a satisfactory functional result, Two ongoing French studies will probably allow progress in this direction by evaluating the feasibility and benefits of this technique in France.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pierre Mongiat-Artus. 2005. [Double kidney transplantation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16097149/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Preoperative volume prediction in adult living donor liver transplantation: how much can we rely on it?

Accurate preoperative prediction of functional donor and remnant hemiliver volumes in live donor liver transplantation is essential in preventing postoperative liver failure and optimizing safety. Our aim was (1) to evaluate volume variability associated with multiphasic CT imaging and (2) to determine over- or under-estimations of 3-D CT graft-volume assessments based on 'largest' versus 'smallest' CT phases with respect to intraoperative findings. Native, arterial and venous phase CT images from 83 potential live liver donors were subject to 3-D CT liver volume calculations and virtual 3-D liver partitioning. Estimates were compared to intraoperative volumes obtained in 43 cases. Calculated (preoperative) graft-volume-body-weight-ratios (GVBWR) versus measured (intraoperative) graft-weight-body-weight-ratios (GWBWR) were analyzed. Significant differences in total liver volume- and in graft-liver volume calculations were found among the largest (venous) and smallest (native) CT phases. High significant overestimations were observed in graft-volume determinations and in GVBWR-calculations based on the 'largest' CT phase when compared to intraoperatively obtained graft-weight and -GWBWR values. In contrast, differences among intraoperative measurements and preoperative calculations based on the 'smallest' CT phase yielded less significant overestimations. While 3-D CT volumetry based on the 'largest' (venous) CT phase is associated with considerable overestimation, 3-D volumetry based on the 'smallest' (native) CT phase accurately matches the intraoperative findings.

Donor Selection↗

Immature monocytes from G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell collections carry surface-bound IL-10 and have the potential to modulate alloreactivity.

Production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 by monocytes has been implicated as a probable negative regulator of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT). Monocytes from G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (gmPBSC) collections have been reported to produce more IL-10 than unmobilized monocytes in response to proinflammatory factors such as LPS. Why this should occur is unclear. In this study, monocyte phenotype and IL-10 localization and release were investigated in PB mononuclear cells (MNC) from 27 healthy donors mobilized for allogeneic SCT and from 13 patients with hematological malignancies mobilized for autologous SCT. All isolates contained elevated total percentages of monocytes in comparison with unmobilized PB, a high proportion of which displayed an immature phenotype. Stimulation of gmPB MNC with an inflammatory stimulus [fixed Staphylococcus aureus cells (SAC)] induced rapid up-regulation of CD14, indicating conversion to mature status. Localization studies indicated that IL-10 was predominantly present, bound on the surface of CD64(+)/CD14(low/neg) immature monocytes. Inflammatory stimuli (LPS, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid, or SAC) induced release of variable quantities of IL-10 from the cell surface. MNC, separated into surface IL-10-positive or -negative fractions, differed in their ability to stimulate alloreactivity in MLR, and IL-10(+) MNC induced significantly lower levels of proliferation than IL-10(-) MNC. Thus, the subset of immature monocytes carrying surface-bound IL-10 in gmPB has the potential to modulate alloreactivity and GvHD after allogeneic SCT through cell-to-cell contact and released IL-10.

Donor Selection↗