PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16100686

TCH-346 (Novartis).

Abstract

TCH-346, an anti-apoptotic compound, is under development by Novartis for the potential treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor neuron disease [271447,342937]. By September 1999, phase I clinical trials for PD were underway [342937]. The compound was discovered in a screen for molecules with both norepinephrine uptake and MAO inhibiting properties but, although it had anti-apoptotic properties, it did not inhibit MAOA or MAO-B [333136,332004]. The compound increases lifespan in the progressive motorneuropathy mouse model and prevents ischemia in models of ischemia and seizure [288893]. In vivo, it shows neurorescuing and anti-apoptotic properties in PC12 cells and cerebellar granule cells, among others, at concentrations of 0.1 pM to 10 microM, suggesting that its action might prove potentially useful against Alzheimer's and/or Parkinson's disease [332004]. The compound has also shown neurorescuing properties in rat pups after axotomy, rat hippocampal CA1 neurons after transient ischemia/hypoxia and mouse nigral dopaminergic (DA) neurons after treatment with MPTP in doses ranging between 0.0003 and 0.1 mg/kg po or sc, depending on the model [333136]. Data presented by the University of Nijmengen and the Free University of Amsterdam show that TCH-346 improves the behavioral and enzymatic outcome in the rat 6-OH-dopamine model of Parkinson's disease. TCH-346 (0.0014 mg/kg sc bid) prevented abnormal stepping (open field test) and prevented increases in fore and hind-paw retraction time. TCH-346 also improved acquisition in the Morris water maze task and, at doses between 0.0014 and 0.14 mg/kg, prevented reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity [345259]. Affinity binding studies with TCH-346 showed that GAPDH is the target [294902,283200]. Differential display RT-PCR also showed that protein-isoaspartyl-methyl transferase is induced by the drug [283200].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Mück-Seler, N Pivac. 2000. TCH-346 (Novartis).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16100686/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗