PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16113967

Ranolazine (Roche Bioscience).

Abstract

Ranolazine is a metabolic modulator that is being developed by CV Therapeutics (CVT), under license from Roche (formerly Syntex), as a potential treatment for angina. In August 1999, the first of two pivotal phase III clinical trials in patients with stable angina was completed. In August 1999, CVT announced initial results from this trial, designated the MARISA trial, of ranolazine in patients with stable angina. At each of the three doses studied, ranolazine significantly increased patients' treadmill exercise duration compared to placebo, the primary endpoint for this trial. MARISA (monotherapy assessment of ranolazine in stable angina) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a sustained release formulation of ranolazine used in 175 patients who were not receiving other anti-anginal drugs. Compared to placebo, ranolazine taken bid at doses of 500, 1000 or 1500 mg significantly increased exercise duration at trough plasma concentrations, which occur at about 12 h after the previous dose. In addition, two key secondary endpoints, exercise time to onset of angina and exercise time to the electrocardiographic appearance of ischemia were also significantly increased by ranolazine compared to placebo at all three doses. The company plans on presenting additional data at a major medical conference, including safety and tolerability data, which are still under analysis. In July 1999 CVT initiated its second phase III trial. The CARISA trial (combination assessment of ranolazine in stable angina) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ranolazine used in combination with other anti-anginal drugs, in approximately 450 patients. The primary endpoint for this trial, duration of exercise on a treadmill, is identical to that used in phase II clinical trials. The CARISA trial, along with the pivotal phase III MARISA trial which completed treatment in June 1999, is expected to form the basis of the company's NDA submission to the FDA. In June 1999, results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of ranolazine in chronic stable angina pectoris were published in the July 1, 1999 issue of the American Journal of Cardiology. The study of 312 patients demonstrated that ranolazine may increase exercise time in chronic stable angina patients. The results also indicate that there may be no change in heart rate or blood pressure among any of the ranolazine dosing regimens. In January 1999, CVT received regulatory clearance in Canada, the Czech Republic and Poland and initiated its first pivotal phase III trial for ranolazine in these countries. These new clinical trial centers complement the US centers enrolling American patients. The compound allows maintenance of energy output by muscle cells by improving oxygen metabolism to make the heart pump more efficiently. Ranolazine may be especially useful in angina patients in whom other therapies are ineffective. Clinical studies suggest that ranolazine lowers the heart's demand for oxygen, by increasing its ability to use carbohydrate rather than fat as a fuel. This is thought to be due to activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase, and also by modulating the activities of L-type calcium channels. This is achieved without reducing heart rate or blood pressure, or impairing pumping ability. In August 1998, CVT signed an agreement with Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, which will manufacture specified quantities of ranolazine for use in clinical trials.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Jones. 1999. Ranolazine (Roche Bioscience).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16113967/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗