PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16121771

Retraining: can do, will do? A practical guide to process and pitfalls.

Abstract

This article reports the lessons learnt from a period of retraining and from discussion with others who have been involved in a similar process. The conclusions are that retraining should only be undertaken once there is full agreement between all parties involved that it is necessary and feasible. There must also be agreement in advance of the criteria which will constitute successful retraining, and the actions which will be taken to ensure the rapid return of the retrainee to the type of practice which is being offered and has been accepted. The process of retraining requires especially close supervision and is very stressful for the retrainee. It is likely that this should only be undertaken in units specially staffed and funded to accommodate this type of work.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Bulstrode, V Hunt, L Hamilton, T Briggs, C Hilton. 2005. Retraining: can do, will do? A practical guide to process and pitfalls.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80088-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Implementation of a competency-based graduate medical education program in a neurology department].

BACKGROUND: Competency-based programs have long been the basis of graduate medical education in British and North America. Such formally defined program structures are lacking in German graduate medical education. METHODS: The methods and assessment tools used in a curriculum-based program of graduate education in medical specialties are presented. The feasibility of the program was tested in day-to-day use in a pilot study conducted within a neurology department. Experience of it during a 1-year period after implementation has also been collected. RESULTS: It was found that implementation of the program is feasible providing that both the trainers and the students are well motivated, that adequate resources are provided, and that a formal training system is provided for the trainers. This is confirmed by the 1-year experience of the program in routine clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The competency-based program presented, which is compatible with many quality management systems, offers management and assessment tools that will make for more satisfactory postgraduate medical education.

Clinical Competence↗