PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16134461

Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes.

Gregory J Zelinsky·Lester C Loschky
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A gaze-contingent short-term memory paradigm was used to obtain forgetting functions for realistic objects in scenes. Experiment 1 had observers freely view nine-item scenes. After observers' gaze left a predetermined target, they could fixate from 1-7 intervening nontargets before the scene was replaced by a spatial probe at the target location. The task was then to select the target from four alternatives. A steep recency benefit was found over the 1-2 intervening object range that declined into an above-chance prerecency asymptote over the remainder of the forgetting function. In Experiment 2, we used sequential presentation and variable delays to explore the contributions of decay and extrafoveal processes to these behaviors. We conclude that memory for objects in scenes, when serialized by fixation sequence, shows recency and prerecency effects that are similar to isolated objects presented sequentially over time. We discuss these patterns in the context of the serial order memory literature and object file theory.

Explore related subjects

Eye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansMemoryPsychomotor PerformanceJournal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gregory J Zelinsky, Lester C Loschky. 2005. Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193524

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Role of visual context and oculomotor conditions in pointing accuracy.

Localizing a target in the extrapersonal space may rely on two types of spatial coordinate systems: egocentric or exocentric. Two experiments investigated the role of these systems in the accuracy of goal-directed movements. The accuracy of pointing movements performed without visual feedback of the hand was measured in two conditions of target presentation (darkness or within a visually structured background), and in two conditions of eye-hand coordination (eye fixed on a fixation point, or with a foveation saccade). The results showed (1) that pointing accuracy increased in the presence of a visual background, and (2) enhancement of this beneficial effect by a steady retinal image of target and background, that is without a foveation saccade. An object that has to be reached in the prehension space can be localized in two ways: (1) in relation to the body (egocentric), induced by the absence of a structured visual environment, (2) in relation to the external space (exocentric), favored by the presence of a visually structured background. We investigated the importance of the localizing mode in the accuracy of reaching movements, and how the two modes can be optimized. We found better reaching accuracy with exocentric than with egocentric localization, particularly when the retinal image of the goal and its environment was stabilized in the absence of eye movements.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed2005

Eye-hand coordination: learning a new trick.

In many manual tasks, a specific repertoire of eye movements accompanies the actions. A new study has shown how this pattern changes as eye and hand become coordinated when learning a new skill.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed2005

The psychology of film: perceiving beyond the cut.

First-order editing violations in film refer either to small displacements of the camera position or to small changes of the image size. Second-order editing violations follow from a reversal of the camera position (reversed-angle shot), leading to a change of the left-right position of the main actors (or objects) and a complete change of the background. With third-order editing violations, the linear sequence of actions in the narrative story is not obeyed. The present experiment focuses on the eye movements following a new shot with or without a reversed-angle camera position. The findings minimize the importance of editing rules which require perceptually smooth transitions between shots; there is also no evidence that changes in the left-right orientation of objects in the scene disturb the visual processing of successive shots. The observed eye movements are due either to the redirecting of attention to the most informative part on the scene or to attention shifts by motion transients in the shot. There is almost no evidence for confusion and/or for activities to restore the spatial arrangement following the reversal of the left-right positions.

Eye Movements↗