PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16143627

Negative clonal selection in tumor evolution.

Abstract

Development of cancer requires the acquisition of multiple oncogenic mutations and selection of the malignant clone. Cancer evolves within a finite host lifetime and mechanisms of carcinogenesis that accelerate this process may be more likely to contribute to the development of clinical cancers. Mutator mutations are mutations that affect genome stability and accelerate the acquisition of oncogenic mutations. However, mutator mutations will also accelerate the accumulation of mutations that decrease cell proliferation, increase apoptosis, or affect other key fitness parameters. These "reduced-fitness" mutations may mediate "negative clonal selection," i.e., selective elimination of premalignant mutator clones. Target reduced-fitness loci may be "recessive" (both copies must be mutated to reduce fitness) or "dominant" (single-copy mutation reduces fitness). A direct mathematical analysis is applied to negative clonal selection, leading to the conclusion that negative clonal selection against mutator clones is unlikely to be a significant effect under realistic conditions. In addition, the relative importance of dominant and recessive reduced-fitness mutations is quantitatively defined. The relative predominance of mutator mutations in clinical cancers will depend on several variables, including the tolerance of the genome for reduced-fitness mutations, particularly the number and potency of dominant reduced-fitness loci.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert A Beckman, Lawrence A Loeb. 2005-09-02. Negative clonal selection in tumor evolution.. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.040840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

LAML-Pro: joint maximum likelihood inference of cell genotypes and cell lineage trees.

MOTIVATION: Recent dynamic lineage tracing technologies use genome editing to induce heritable mutations, or edits, that accumulate across successive cell divisions. These edits are measured using single-cell sequencing or imaging, providing data to reconstruct cell lineages at single-cell resolution. Current computational approaches to infer cell lineage trees, or phylogenies, from these data perform two separate steps: (i) Identify each cell's edits (genotype) from the raw sequencing or imaging data; (ii) Infer a cell lineage tree from the cell genotypes. However, genotyping cells is an inexact process and genotype errors can yield an inaccurate lineage tree. For example, using fluorescence based-imaging to measure edits results in a high fraction (≈25%-50%) of uncertain or erroneous genotypes. RESULTS: We introduce Lineage Analysis via Maximum Likelihood with PRobabilistic Observations (LAML-Pro), an algorithm that jointly infers cell genotypes and a cell lineage tree. LAML-Pro is based on the Probabilistic Mixed-type Missing Observation (PMMO) model, which we derive to describe both the genome editing and genotype observation processes. LAML-Pro constructs lineage trees from thousands of cells in under an hour by leveraging the sparsity of transitions under the PMMO model. On simulated data, we demonstrate that LAML-Pro corrects genotype errors and infers substantially more accurate trees than existing methods which are vulnerable to genotype errors. Applied to data from two recent imaging-based lineage tracing systems, LAML-Pro reduces genotype errors by 5-fold and produces more spatially coherent lineage trees compared to existing methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: LAML-Pro is implemented in C++ and is available as both a command-line interface and as a Python library at: github.com/raphael-group/LAML-Pro.

Cell Lineage↗

Multicolor Cell Lineage Tracing Using MAGIC Markers Strategies.

Multicolor MAGIC Markers strategies are useful lineage tracing tools to study brain development at a multicellular scale. In this chapter, we describe an in utero electroporation method to simultaneously label multiple neighboring progenitors and their respective progeny using these multicolor reporters. In utero electroporation enables the introduction of any gene of interest into embryonic neural progenitors lining the brain ventricles through a simple pipeline consisting of a micro-injection followed by the application of electrical pulses. Successful in utero electroporation requires a concise yet complete understanding of each step of the surgical protocol, spanning from the preoperative preparation to the postoperative care, as well as the MAGIC Markers tool outlined in this study. Besides a detailed protocol, we present non-integrative and integrative approaches to demonstrate the range of cell and lineage tracking possibilities of multicolored progenitors and their descent over time.

Cell Lineage↗

Defining cell lineages in the prostate epithelium.

Understanding the stages of cell differentiation in the normal prostate epithelium is essential for the identification of the cell type(s) involved in prostatic carcinogenesis. Prostate glands are composed of three types of epithelial cells (i.e., basal, secretory and neuroendocrine) but the hierarchical relations among these cell types have been long controversial. We have recently developed a novel system to define prostate epithelial cell lineages in vivo. We find that, during normal prostate organogenesis, terminally differentiated secretory cells derive from p63-positive basal cells, which thus represent/include prostate stem cells. Future studies will determine if p63-positive basal cells retain stem cells capabilities in the adult prostate epithelium.

Cell Lineage↗