PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16160292

Security Services for the HemaCAM Project.

Kjeld Engel·Heiko Kuziela·Bernd Blobel·Peter Pharow
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Within the HemaCAM project which deals with automated differential white blood cell count by image processing, a security infrastructure has been integrated. The security services for this demonstrator have been derived from the German health network ONCONET that enables a trustworthy framework for both health professionals and patients as well as supports clinical studies. For the solution, services assuring both communication security and application security have to be provided. This task has been realised by the use of the security token Health Professional Card and an appropriate Trusted Third Party infrastructure.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationComputer Communication NetworksComputer SecurityHealth PersonnelHumansMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kjeld Engel, Heiko Kuziela, Bernd Blobel, Peter Pharow. 2005. Security Services for the HemaCAM Project.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16160292/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗