PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16160338

Making two-level standards work in legacy communication frameworks.

Abstract

The research presented deals with the problem of how information technology can support the interconnection of medical information systems in practice. We apply a two-part structural standard that consists of a fixed Information Reference (IR) Model, and an Archetype Reference (AR) Model that uses the structures of the IR model. A very important problem with the real-world application of such a two-level model is that the high level (abstract) entities, structures and their connections must be somehow translated into lower level equivalents that legacy database information systems can actually use to program their standardised interface. Our choice for the lower level medium is XML, such that the standard appears as an XSD schema that can be used, in the usual way, to validate a message document. To test the viability of the above paradigm, we developed an archetype-XSD translator tool in the form of Protégé/OWL plugins and tested it on an industrial interface for exchanging medical episodes (MedQuery), using an implementation of openEHR. We found that the most important features: Containment, Cardinality, Named references to other instances, and References to external terminologies, could all be mapped to standard XSD constructs. We also developed a validator plugin to check external references. We plan to put the system at work in a heterogeneous medical messaging system (a descendant of the Budapest based MediNet system) in the near future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Istvan Vassanyi, Jozsef Barcza, Tamas Tobak. 2005. Making two-level standards work in legacy communication frameworks.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16160338/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗