PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1616460

Genetic Tobit factor analysis: quantitative genetic modeling with censored data.

Abstract

Parameters of quantitative genetic models have traditionally been estimated by either algebraic manipulation of familial correlations (or familial mean squares), biometric model fitting, or multiple-group covariance structure analysis. With few exceptions, researchers who have used these methods for the analysis of twin data have assumed that their data were multinormal and, consequently, have used normal-theory estimation methods. It is shown that normal-theory methods produce biased genetic and environmental parameter estimates when data are censored. Specifically, with censored data, (1) normal-theory estimates of narrow-sense heritability are either positively or negatively biased, whereas (2) estimates of shared-familial environmental variance are always biased downward. An alternative method for estimating genetic and environmental parameters from censored twin data is proposed. The method is called genetic Tobit factor analysis (GTFA) and is an extension of the Tobit factor analysis model developed by Muthén (Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 42, 241-250, 1989). Using a Monte Carlo design, the performance of GTFA is compared to traditional quantitative genetic methods in both large and small data sets. The results of this study suggest that GTFA is the preferred method for the genetic modeling of censored data obtained from twins.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N G Waller, B O Muthén. 1992. Genetic Tobit factor analysis: quantitative genetic modeling with censored data.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01066662

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The Role of Emergence in Genetically Informed Relationships Research: A Methodological Analysis.

This paper provides a critical analysis of genetically informed research on relationships, with an emphasis on relationships among unrelated individuals (e.g., spouses). To date, research in this area has used traditional behavioral genetic frameworks to either partition the variance in relationship-related outcomes into genetic and environmental components, or to examine gene-environment interplay between relationship factors and other outcomes. However, this conventional approach is at odds with the long-standing understanding from the field of relationship science that both partners' characteristics matter when predicting shared outcomes-that is, outcomes that are emergent. We examine briefly the philosophical concept of emergence, and discuss ways to model dyadic outcomes in genetically informed relationships research. We also review the related topic of social genetic effects, which refer to the influence of a social partner's genotype on a proband's phenotype. A genetically informed dyadic perspective has potentially important consequences for our understanding of the pathways from genotype→shared or individual-level phenotypes, and more fully recognizes the complexity of how genetic and social/environmental factors come together to influence human behavior.

Genetics, Behavioral↗

Suicidal behavior in surviving co-twins.

Recent research has provided strong support for the existence of a familial risk for suicide, and efforts have been made to separate genetic from enviromental risk factors. Twin studies have played a major role in the identification of genetic factors, and the results indicate that the concordance rate for suicide is higher in identical than in fraternal twins (Baldessarini & Hennen, 2004). Moreover, Segal and Roy (1995) reported a significantly higher frequency of nonfatal suicidal attempts by monozygotic (MZ) than by dyzygotic (DZ) twins whose co-twins had committed suicide. However, doubts remain as to whether the increased risk of suicide in MZ twins is a response to the intense grief over the loss of a close relative, or whether a common genotype is associated with suicidal behavior. Sudden loss, which may carry a stigma in the case of a suicide, has been linked to increased persistent emotional stress and physiological changes (Epstein, 1993; Martin & Dean, 1993). A number of researchers have reported greater suicidal ideation among bereaved MZ twins as compared to DZ twins, suggesting that a loss due to suicide may increase the risk of suicidal behavior in the surviving co-twin (Segal & Bouchard, 1993; Segal & Roy, 1995; Segal et al., 1995). The aim of the present article is to address the issue of the intense grief experienced by twins after the co-twin suicide.

Genetics, Behavioral↗