PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16168929

Multiple sclerosis and birth order: a longitudinal cohort study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetic epidemiological studies suggest both genetic and environmental factors have a role in multiple sclerosis (MS). Environmental effects are strongly suggested from geographical gradients, migration data, and discordance rates in twins. In epidemiological studies, risk of MS in offspring of small families and in those with an early birth-order position has been reported and interpreted in the context of the hygiene hypothesis, which is that infections at an early age, introduced by older siblings, are protective. We aimed to study the effect of birth order on MS risk. METHODS: A longitudinal, population-based sample of individuals with MS and their healthy siblings were identified from the Canadian Collaborative Project on Genetic Susceptibility to MS. Data were grouped according to single (simplex) or multiple (multiplex) siblings with MS in a sibship. Separate analyses were done for each sibship size. FINDINGS: We studied 10 995 individuals with MS and 26 336 healthy siblings, and found no relation between MS risk and birth-order position. In simplex sibships of at least seven siblings, slightly more siblings who were born late in the birth order had MS; the same was found for the first-born sibling with MS in a multiplex sibship. Siblings with MS were slightly younger (p<0.0001) than those without MS, contrary to the expected age at onset bias. INTERPRETATION: These findings do not support the hygiene hypothesis and could be due to a cohort effect resulting from increasing MS incidence. Birth order has no effect on MS risk in most families, and there is no support for the hypothesis that having older siblings protects against MS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Dessa Sadovnick, Irene M L Yee, George C Ebers, Canadian Collaborative Study Group. 2005. Multiple sclerosis and birth order: a longitudinal cohort study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(05)70170-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sex ratio of older siblings in heterosexual and homosexual, right-handed and non-right-handed men.

This study investigated why older brothers, which increase the odds of homosexuality in later-born males who are right-handed, have no effect or the opposite effect on later-born males who are non-right-handed. The specific question was whether the different results for the non-right-handed men have to do with the heterosexual non-right-handers or the homosexual non-right-handers. The human sex ratio at birth (106 males per 100 females) was used as a gold standard for determining which groups differ from the general population and in which direction. All usable data from previous studies were combined to obtain the largest possible sample (N = 8,201). The observed ratio of older brothers to older sisters was 105 for the heterosexual right-handers, 128 for the homosexual right-handers, 127 for the heterosexual non-right-handers, and 96 for the homosexual non-right-handers. The ratios for the homosexual right-handers and the heterosexual non-right-handers differed significantly from the expected value. These results suggest that both heterosexual and homosexual non-right-handers contribute to the older brothers x handedness x sexual orientation interaction.

Birth Order↗

Extreme right-handedness, older brothers, and sexual orientation in men.

Two of the most consistent correlates of sexual orientation in men are handedness and fraternal birth order (i.e., number of older brothers). In the present study, the relationship among handedness, older brothers, and sexual orientation was studied in 4 samples of heterosexual and gay or bisexual men (N = 944). Unlike previous studies, which have only observed an increased rate of non-right-handedness in gay or bisexual men relative to heterosexual men, an elevated rate of extreme right-handedness was found in gay or bisexual men relative to heterosexual men. The results also demonstrated that older brothers moderate the relationship between handedness and sexual orientation. Specifically, older brothers increase the odds of being gay or bisexual in moderate right-handers only; in both non-right-handers and extreme right-handers, older brothers do not affect (or decrease) the odds of being gay or bisexual. The results have implications for an early neurodevelopmental origin to sexual orientation in men.

Birth Order↗

The sex ratio of older siblings in non-right-handed homosexual men.

This study tested the prediction, based on prior research, that non-right-handed homosexual men will report fewer than expected older brothers. Participants were 2486 heterosexual and homosexual, right-handed and non-right-handed, male and female adults, representing five samples collected for various projects by the second author. Data on sibship composition, sexual orientation, and hand-preference were gathered in the original research using on-line (Internet) or self-administered paper-and-pencil questionnaires. The non-right-handed homosexual men reported 83 older brothers per 100 older sisters, which was significantly lower than the human sex ratio of 106 live-born males per 100 live-born females. In contrast, the right-handed homosexual men reported 125 older brothers per 100 older sisters, which was significantly higher than the expected ratio. One possible explanation of these results is that older brothers increase the odds of homosexuality in right-handed males but decrease the odds of homosexuality in non-right-handed males. A second possibility is that older brothers decrease the probability that non-right-handed homosexual males will be represented in survey research. The latter scenario could arise if the combination of some biological factor associated with older brothers and some biological factor associated with non-right-handedness is so toxic that it kills the fetus or predisposes the individual to a condition (e.g., mental retardation, major mental illness) that makes him less likely to be available for research recruitment at Gay Pride parades (etc.) than other members of the gay community.

Birth Order↗