PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16171221

Carotid stenting.

Abstract

Coding personnel should be aware of the new CPT guidelines for reporting carotid and vertebral stent placement. Payors' billing requirements for these procedures vary, and it is important to determine before billing whether the payor will accept the applicable CPT category I or III code or whether an unlisted code must be reported. Coding guidancefor these procedures will likely continue to evolve in thenear future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jackie Miller. 2005. Carotid stenting.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16171221/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Identifying inflamed carotid plaques using in vivo USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to label plaque macrophages.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation within atherosclerotic lesions contributes to plaque instability and vulnerability to rupture. We set out to evaluate the use of a macrophage labeling agent to identify carotid plaque inflammation by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis scheduled for carotid endarterectomy underwent multi-sequence MRI of the carotid bifurcation before and after injection of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIOs). USPIO particles accumulated in macrophages in 24 of 30 plaques (80%). Areas of signal intensity reduction, corresponding to USPIO/macrophage-positive histological sections, were visualized in 24 of 27 (89%) patients, with an average reduction in signal intensity induced by the USPIO particles of 24% (range, 3.1% to 60.8%). CONCLUSIONS: USPIO-enhanced MRI can identify plaque inflammation in vivo by accumulation of USPIO within macrophages in carotid plaques.

Carotid Stenosis↗

[Unilateral ocular ischemic syndrome in a diabetic patient].

PURPOSE: To report a case of ocular ischemic syndrome in a diabetic patient. METHODS: The patient's main complaint was an insidious unilateral decrease in visual acuity of the right eye. This diabetic 60-year-old patient presented numerous vascular risk factors. RESULTS: Diagnosis was suspected from the fundus examination and was confirmed on ultrasonic carotid imaging combined with MR angiography showing a significant internal carotid artery stenosis. CONCLUSION: This case should remind clinicians to be cautious when dealing with any asymmetric ophthalmological exam. The diagnosis of ocular ischemic syndrome has to be suspected in case of unilateral retinal ischemia.

Carotid Stenosis↗