Controlled microfluidic interfaces.

Javier Atencia; David J Beebe

doi:10.1038/nature04163

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16193039

Controlled microfluidic interfaces.

Javier Atencia·David J Beebe

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The microfabrication technologies of the semiconductor industry have made it possible to integrate increasingly complex electronic and mechanical functions, providing us with ever smaller, cheaper and smarter sensors and devices. These technologies have also spawned microfluidics systems for containing and controlling fluid at the micrometre scale, where the increasing importance of viscosity and surface tension profoundly affects fluid behaviour. It is this confluence of available microscale engineering and scale-dependence of fluid behaviour that has revolutionized our ability to precisely control fluid/fluid interfaces for use in fields ranging from materials processing and analytical chemistry to biology and medicine.

Explore related subjects

Diffusion Microfluidics Phase Transition Surface Properties Surface Tension Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Javier Atencia, David J Beebe. 2005-09-29. Controlled microfluidic interfaces.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04163

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Exploring the relationship between funneled energy landscapes and two-state protein folding.

It should take an astronomical time span for unfolded protein chains to find their native state based on an unguided conformational random search. The experimental observation that folding is fast can be rationalized by assuming that protein energy landscapes are sloped towards the native state minimum, such that rapid folding can proceed from virtually any point in conformational space. Folding transitions often exhibit two-state behavior, involving extensively disordered and highly structured conformers as the only two observable kinetic species. This study employs a simple Brownian dynamics model of "protein particles" moving in a spherically symmetrical potential. As expected, the presence of an overall slope towards the native state minimum is an effective means to speed up folding. However, the two-state nature of the transition is eradicated if a significant energetic bias extends too far into the non-native conformational space. The breakdown of two-state cooperativity under these conditions is caused by a continuous conformational drift of the unfolded proteins. Ideal two-state behavior can only be maintained on surfaces exhibiting large regions that are energetically flat, a result that is supported by other recent data in the literature (Kaya and Chan, Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2003;52:510-523). Rapid two-state folding requires energy landscapes exhibiting the following features: (i) A large region in conformational space that is energetically flat, thus allowing for a significant degree of random sampling, such that unfolded proteins can retain a random coil structure; (ii) a trapping area that is strongly sloped towards the native state minimum.

Diffusion↗

PubMed2006

The sediment-water flux of HOCs due to "diffusion" or is there a well-mixed layer? If there is, does it matter?

In most present modeling of the sediment-water flux of hydrophobic organic chemicals (HOCs), the flux due to sediment erosion/deposition is described explicitly by means of a sediment transport model, while the remaining components of the flux (molecular diffusion, bioturbation, and groundwater flow) are lumped together and modeled as a "diffusive" flux. This diffusive flux is usually described by means of a mass transfer approximation with the implicit assumption of a well-mixed contaminant layer of thickness h in the sediments. On the basis of recent experiments and theoretical modeling, the justification forthis assumption and the quantification of this diffusive flux are discussed here. In particular, for HOCs with large partition coefficients, it is argued that a well-mixed layer often may not exist, and, when it does, it is slow to form; that h is difficult to define and even harder to quantify; and that, as far as long-term predictions (up to 100 years) of this diffusive flux are concerned, the exact value for h probably does not matter. What does matter are the magnitudes and time dependencies of each of the components of the flux and the interactions between the diffusive flux and the flux due to erosion/deposition.

Diffusion↗

PubMed2006

Theoretical comparison of how soil processes affect uptake of metals by diffusive gradients in thinfilms and plants.

The theoretical basis for using measurements of metal uptake by the technique of diffusive gradients in thinfilms (DGT) to mimic processes in soils that affect uptake of metals by plants is examined. The uptake of metals by plants and DGT were compared conceptually and quantitatively by using the classic Barber model of plant uptake and the DIFS (DGT-induced fluxes in soils) model of uptake by DGT. For most metals and plants considered, uptake fluxes were similar to those induced by DGT using the most common gel layer thicknesses of 0.2 to 2 mm. Consequently DGT perturbs the chemical equilibrium of metals in the soil solution and between soil solution and solid phase, to a similar extent to plants, and therefore induces a similar balance in supply by diffusion and by release from the solid phase. DIFS was used to show that desorption kinetics, which are not considered by the plant uptake model, are likely important for uptake when the capacity of the soil solid phase is large. Model calculations showed that mass flow into a plant root would only contribute appreciably to the total flux of metal under circumstances when the solid phase reservoir of metal was very low. Generally, however, DGT is likely to emulate supply processes from the soil that govern uptake of metal by plants. Exceptions are likely to be found in poorly buffered soils (typically sandy and/or low pH), and at very high concentrations of metals in soil solution, such that the soil solution concentration at the plant root interface is higher than the Michaelis-Menten constant (Km).

Diffusion↗