PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16208882

Self-experimentation, ethics and efficacy.

Abstract

Much fundamental progress in medicine and, more broadly, in medical sciences has required or benefited from self-experiments. This review provides a definition of self-experiments in which experimenters themselves are subjects for their research, and it considers the logical steps which such experiments require. Lay, medical and scientific communities are often unaware of the contributions and the full range of outcomes from self-experiments. Hence, some implications for ethics committees are explored.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S C Gandevia. 2005. Self-experimentation, ethics and efficacy.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03351434

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Physicians who experimented on themselves: risk-taking among physicians and researchers].

Throughout history, we can find physicians and scientists who made important discoveries through self-experimentation or by risk-taking. Some were consciously exposed to plagues, some swallowed germs or chemicals and some put themselves in extreme physiological situations. Today, it seems that these stories are completely unnecessary: ethics, together with concrete controlled studies guidelines, suffice to avoid self-experimentations.

Autoexperimentation↗