PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16221854

Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex.

Abstract

Many visual tasks require deployment of attention to multiple objects or locations. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioral experiments to investigate the relative processing efficiency of two putative attentional mechanisms for performing such tasks: the "zoom lens" and "multiple spotlights." Two key questions were investigated: (1) does splitting the spotlight into multiple foci incur an overhead cost that diminishes the efficacy of attention compared with the zoom lens, and (2) does splitting the spotlight provide a benefit relative to the zoom lens by conserving attention resources that otherwise would be directed to task irrelevant stimuli? For both mechanisms, attending to multiple object locations decreased processing efficiency at a single location, resulting in both decreased behavioral performance and decreased blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal attentional modulation. When the two mechanisms attended to multiple objects across the same spatial extent, the multiple spotlight mechanism, which ignores intervening stimuli, yielded better performance and higher BOLD signal. When the two mechanisms processed the same number of stimuli, splitting the spotlight neither impaired performance nor diminished BOLD signal in occipital cortex. The surprising efficiency of the multiple spotlight mechanism supports the emerging view that spatial attention is easily deployed in a diverse range of spatial configurations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephanie A McMains, David C Somers. 2005-10-12. Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex.. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2647-05.2005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗