PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1622355

Are you seeing a mass killer?

Abstract

Whatever the underlying reasons, we have to be prepared for more episodes of this nature, and as medical practitioners do what we can to prevent them. With the wisdom of hindsight it is possible to suggest that the Knight and Vitkovic killings could have been avoided. Knight had a history of violence causing him to leave Duntroon Military College. Despite this, he was not prevented from holding a shooter's licence in his own State, and in particular nothing was done to stop him having a collection of weapons. Vitkovic sought help from a university psychology clinic and from the Church of Scientology. Coroner Hal Hallenstein criticised the Church of Scientology for failing to help Vitkovic after he failed their personality test on 8 October 1987, and also suggested that a general obligation be placed on psychologists to refer to a psychiatrist if they think that is required. Practitioners' concern for their own safety must be considered. It would have been an extraordinarily difficult and possibly risky task to try to deter Julian Knight from persisting in his adoration of aggression and love of weapons, or to talk Frank Vitkovic out of watching violent films and videos and later purchasing a semi-automatic weapon. Nevertheless, the practitioner's responsibility remains, and as a last resort notification to police of the risk posed by the person might have to be considered. Unfortunately the anonymity of a practitioner making such a notification might not be able to be guaranteed, given current freedom of information legislation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Milton. 1992. Are you seeing a mass killer?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1622355/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Whole genome characterisation of Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 'μVar' like variants over time.

Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) is a major pathogen of Pacific oysters (Magallana gigas), linked to mass mortality events worldwide and presents a substantial threat to global aquaculture. Since 2010, mortality events have been occurring in Pacific oysters within Australia with the cause being an OsHV-1 microvariant highly similar to OsHV-1 μVar first detected in France, 2008. In this study, fifteen OsHV-1 whole genomes were assembled from Australian and New Zealand mortality events, including twelve newly sequenced genomes and three assembled from public datasets. Whole-genome phylogenetic analyses indicate that Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 isolates form a distinct clade, separate from European and East Asian genomes, and with moderate regional and temporal divergence across the past 14 years. Across the dataset, multiple biologically relevant mutations were observed in genes of known function, including DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase subunits, and apoptosis-related proteins, though most mutations occurred in uncharacterised genes. These findings highlight the limitations of single-gene typing and support the need for whole-genome approaches in understanding OsHV-1 evolution. Critically, the lack of recent whole-genome data, particularly from East and Southeast Asia, restricts the ability to trace viral origins and detect novel variants, underscoring the need for expanded global OsHV-1 genomic surveillance.

Australia↗

Interest holder-driven research priorities in sexual and reproductive health for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia using a priority setting partnership approach. METHODS: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted with 92 interest holders: 31 youth from migrant and refugee backgrounds and 61 professionals (healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers and community leaders), recruited online and in-person. The priority setting partnership process included a rapid evidence scan, an online uncertainty survey, evidence verification, interim prioritisation and a final consensus workshop. RESULTS: Eighty-three research uncertainties yielded 11 final priorities across four sexual and reproductive health domains: sexual and reproductive health literacy, sexual violence prevention, accessible services and maternal health. A striking divergence emerged between youth and professional priorities only 3 achieved combined high-priority consensus. Youth prioritised a broader range of topics, including abortion access (rated high by youth but low by professionals), while professionals prioritised fewer areas. Two priorities achieved consensus: community-based maternal health support and barriers to reporting gender-based violence. CONCLUSION: This is the first priority setting partnership to identify sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee youth in Australia and to uniquely highlight substantial misalignment between youth and professional priorities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: These identified priorities provide a foundation for targeted research, culturally responsive policy and more equitable sexual and reproductive health service provision for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults.

Australia↗