PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16228376

The C(4) pathway: an efficient CO(2) pump.

Abstract

The C(4) pathway is a complex combination of both biochemical and morphological specialisation, which provides an elevation of the CO(2) concentration at the site of Rubisco. We review the key parameters necessary to make the C(4) pathway function efficiently, focussing on the diffusion of CO(2) out of the bundle sheath compartment. Measurements of cell wall thickness show that the thickness of bundle sheath cell walls in C(4) species is similar to cell wall thickness of C(3) mesophyll cells. Furthermore, NAD-ME type C(4) species, which do not have suberin in their bundle sheath cell walls, do not appear to compensate for this with thicker bundle sheath cell walls. Uncertainties in the CO(2) diffusion properties of membranes, such as the plasmalemma, choroplast and mitochondrial membranes make it difficult to estimate bundle sheath diffusion resistance from anatomical measurements, but the cytosol itself may account for more than half of the final calculated resistance value for CO(2) leakage. We conclude that the location of the site of decarboxylation, its distance from the mesophyll interface and the physical arrangement of chloroplasts and mitochondria in the bundle sheath cell are as important to the efficiency of the process as the properties of the bundle sheath cell wall. Using a mathemathical model of C(4) photosynthesis, we also examine the relationship between bundle sheath resistance to CO(2) diffusion and the biochemical capacity of the C(4) photosynthetic pathway and conclude that bundle sheath resistance to CO(2) diffusion must vary with biochemical capacity if the efficiency of the C(4) pump is to be maintained. Finally, we construct a mathematical model of single cell C(4) photosynthesis in a C(3) mesophyll cell and examine the theoretical efficiency of such a C(4) photosynthetic CO(2) pump.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Susanne von Caemmerer, Robert T Furbank. 2003. The C(4) pathway: an efficient CO(2) pump.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1025830019591

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗