PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16237517

Using half-normal probability plot and regression analysis to differentiate complex traits: differentiating disease response of multigenic resistance and susceptibility in tomatoes to multiple pathogen isolates.

Abstract

The need for a new analytical approach was encountered in the course of characterizing newly developed tomato lines resistant to late blight. Late blight resistant tomato lines were created in independent breeding programs using the accession Solanum pimpinellifolium L. (formerly Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (L.) Miller) L3708 as the source of the resistance. However, initial field observation suggested that the late blight resistance in the lines produced by two independent breeding programs differed. Possible causes included a partial transfer of the late blight resistance derived from S. pimpinellifolium L3708 or the possibility of race specificity of this resistance. A crucial issue was determining the most appropriate and robust analytical method to use with data from laboratory analyses of the responses of nine tomato lines against five P. infestans isolates. Prior analysis by standard ANOVA revealed significant differences across tomato lines but could not determine whether the disease responses in the CLN-R lines were different from those of the heterozygous F(1) hybrids, created by crossing susceptible tomatoes with the fixed CU-R lines. A different analytical method was needed. Therefore, sporangia numbers/leaflet and diseased area data were analyzed using a half-normal probability plot and regression analysis. The results of this analysis show its utility for genetic or pathology studies. Considering only populations of the uniform tomato lines, this method confirms the results obtained by using a standard ANOVA, but provides a clearer demonstration of the distributions of the individuals within the populations and how this distribution impacts variance and the difference among the populations. This method also allows a joint analysis of the uniform lines with an additional population that is less uniform, because it is segregating. Such an analysis would be invalid using a standard ANOVA. The results of this joint analysis determined that the additional population was divergent from the fixed CU-R lines, and, against some isolates, against the CLN-R lines as well. Half-normal probability plot analysis method would be applicable more broadly beyond analysis of disease resistance data. It could be useful for data from populations that are not normally distributed, for traits which are affected by epistatic gene action, and could be useful for selection of extremes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Min-Jea Kim, Walter Federer, Martha A Mutschler. 2005-10-20. Using half-normal probability plot and regression analysis to differentiate complex traits: differentiating disease response of multigenic resistance and susceptibility in tomatoes to multiple pathogen isolates.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0084-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Contribution of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens].

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the sensitivity of PCR versus culture of complex tuberculosis mycobacteria and to determine the delay between PCR results and identification of mycobacteria in culture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine pulmonary and 66 extrapulmonary specimens were analyzed. Samples were inoculated on liquid (MGIT, Bactec) and solid media (Coletsos) and respectively incubated 6 and 12 weeks. Identification was performed by reverse hybridization of PCR products to their complementary probes immobilized on membrane strips (Genotype MTBC, HAIN). Specimens DNA detection was realized by PCR (Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test, Roche). RESULTS: Sensitivity of PCR for acid fast bacilli smear positive pulmonary (50/50) and extrapulmonary (7/7) specimens was 100%. Delay between PCR result and identification was 11 days for pulmonary specimens and 8 days for extrapulmonary specimens. Sensitivity of PCR for smear negative samples was, respectively, of 78.7% (37/47) and 51.8% (29/56) for pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens. In case of PCR positive result of a smear negative sample, a gap of respectively 13 and 12 days was obtained for pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens compared to identification. CONCLUSION: Positive PCR result for respiratory specimens allows a gap of 11 to 13 days in diagnosis in comparison with identification of mycobacteria in culture.

Genotype↗