PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16237637

Issues with polymorphism analysis in sepsis.

Abstract

Genetic variation has been shown to play a large role in determining susceptibility to and outcome of such complex diseases as sepsis. There is a much higher heritability of death due to infection than death due to cancer or heart disease. More than 8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been detected in the human genome, and there is very little understanding of their effect on gene expression and protein function. The use of haplotypes, which are inherited sets of linked SNPs, as the unit of genetic variation in association studies and the marking of these haplotypes with unique "tag SNPs" may help to narrow down the search for causal SNPs. Future studies must be large (thousands of patients) and must be carefully designed to avoid false associations resulting from ethnic differences in genotype frequencies and disease prevalence in order to find true, reproducible associations between genotype and phenotype. Functional studies and careful characterization of intermediate phenotypes must be done to lend biological plausibility to genotype-phenotype associations. Examination of the association between genetic polymorphisms and sepsis promises to provide clinicians with new tools to evaluate prognosis, to intervene early and aggressively in treating high-risk persons, and to avoid the use of therapies with adverse effects in treating low-risk persons.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ainsley M Sutherland, James A Russell. 2005-11-15. Issues with polymorphism analysis in sepsis.. https://doi.org/10.1086/431989

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Psychiatric disorder criteria and their application to research in different racial groups.

BACKGROUND: The advent of standardized classification and assessment of psychiatric disorders, and considerable joint efforts among many countries has led to the reporting of international rates of psychiatric disorders, and inevitably, their comparison between different racial groups. RESULTS: In neurologic diseases with defined genetic etiologies, the same genetic cause has different phenotypes in different racial groups. CONCLUSION: We suggest that genetic differences between races mean that diagnostic criteria refined in one racial group, may not be directly and simply applicable to other racial groups and thus more effort needs to be expended on defining diseases in other groups. Cross-racial confounds (in addition to cultural confounds) make the interpretation of rates in different groups even more hazardous than seems to have been appreciated.

Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic↗