PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16238707

Diagnosing and predicting refractory epilepsy.

Abstract

Over 30% of people with epilepsy will never achieve remission with antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. These individuals are often severely disabled by their condition, have an unsatisfactory quality of life, and are at increased risk of sudden unexpected death. Early identification of refractory epilepsy would allow prompt referral to specialist services, where the diagnosis can be confirmed, seizures and syndromes classified, AED therapy optimized, and suitability for surgery assessed. Recent studies suggest that patients with symptomatic or cryptogenic epilepsy, those who experience multiple seizures before AED treatment initiation, and those with febrile convulsions, a family history of epilepsy, or psychiatric comorbidities are least likely to respond to drug therapy. Failure to achieve good seizure control with the first one or two AED monotherapies is usually sufficient to highlight the possibility of subsequent refractory epilepsy. For most of these individuals, combination therapy using AEDs with complementary modes of action is the recommended treatment approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Brodie. 2005. Diagnosing and predicting refractory epilepsy.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00507.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗