PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1624244

Uroflow via stenotic urethra.

Abstract

A DANTEC 2100 mictometer type 21C10 with uroflow transducer type 21KO2 was used for investigation of 50 men with urethral strictures (mean age 59 +/- 14 years). The patients underwent a total of 334 clinical evaluations of replicate voiding (minimum 4, maximum 16) before and after successful urethral dilatation on an outpatient basis. Using t-paired comparison test, significant increase in maximum urinary flow rate (P less than 0.01) after the treatment procedure was evidenced in each of the patients. The variability of other urinary flow parameters suggested a lower significance in evaluation of urine stream quality. The McNemar test showed a significant shift from one to another zone of classification suggested by Drach et al. (P less than 0.01), i.e. 64% of patients reached normal or overlap zone in the first spontaneous voiding after urethral dilatation. Furthermore, no significant difference could be established with one-way ANOVA between urodynamic variables of mean values of repetitive voidings in cases of urethral stenosis of different aetiology either before or after urethral dilatation (P greater than 0.05), suggesting that urethral stenoses of different aetiology are characterized by similar urodynamic features. A highly significant linear correlation was found between the maximum flow rate and the voided volume only after urethral dilatation (r = 0.522, P less than 0.01), while correlation with urethral sound sizes could not be established (r = 0.207, P greater than 0.5). We conclude that uroflowmetry provides reliable information on the patient's ability to void. The use of maximum flow rate may predict the time at which urethral dilatation becomes necessary and provides objective evidence of the efficacy of treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N S Bukurov, K B Stefanović, J M Marinković. 1992. Uroflow via stenotic urethra.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02552118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗