PubMed · 16244415
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Zahir Altug, Aysegul Dalkiran Arslan. 2005. A mini-maxillary protractor for Class III correction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16244415/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the use of two distractors for a simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction osteogenesis without the use of intermaxillary fixation in the restorative treatment of hemifacial microsomia. METHODS: The authors analyzed the clinical and radiological data of five patients with type I hemifacial microsomia (one patient), type IIa hemifacial microsomia (two patients), and Goldenhar syndrome (two patients). Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: All the patients had satisfactory correction of the facial asymmetry without complications. Complete horizontalization of the occlusal plane was achieved in three patients, whereas a cant of 2 degrees persisted in two patients. None of the children in this study were noncompliant with the prescribed duration of the active distraction period, nor did they experience technical problems with the two devices. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction osteogenesis resulted in a high rate of success in correcting facial asymmetry as well as occlusal plane cant. It offered good aesthetic satisfaction.
The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal and dental changes after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME). Clinical trials were carried out that assessed skeletal and dental changes through cephalograms, computer tomographs or dental casts. No other simultaneous treatment during the active expansion period was accepted. Electronic databases (Pubmed, Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, All Evidence-based Medicine Reviews, Embase, Web of Science and Lilacs) were searched. Abstracts which appeared to fulfil the selection criteria were selected by consensus. The original articles were then retrieved and evaluated with a methodological checklist. Their references were hand searched for possible missing articles. Only 12 articles fulfilled the selection criteria. All presented methodological flaws. An individual methodological analysis of these articles was made. Expansion was greater at the molars and diminished progressively to the anterior part of the dental arch in all the evaluation periods. Vertical and sagittal skeletal changes were nil or not clinically significant. The nasal portion of the maxillary complex showed an increase in dimensions thereby improving nasal patency. An overall dental relapse of 0.5-1 mm is reported after 1 year of orthodontic treatment. The conclusions should be considered with caution because only a secondary level of evidence was found.
The lateral cephalometric radiograph supplies the clinician with valuable information regarding the facial skeletal morphology of the patient, provided that it is taken correctly. These radiographs should be taken while the patient is occluding in maximum intercuspation, failing which the exposure is often repeated, leading to an increase in patient radiation dose as well as added cost in time and materials. This study investigated the relationship between limited bite opening and selected cephalometric variables. Thirty-one dry skulls were used and five splints were constructed for each skull giving increments of bite opening from 0 to 5 mm. Six lateral radiographs per skull were taken at each increment of bite opening. The radiographs were traced and the points plotted using a reflex metrograph. A linear relationship was found between bite opening and SNB, ANB, SN-mandibular plane, and SN-Y-axis angles. Errors in digitization, superimposition, and landmark identification were determined and found to be acceptable. Regression analysis produced a highly significant (P < 0.001) gradient for each of these angular relationships, allowing a set of correction factors to be produced, which can be applied to bite openings up to 5 mm.