PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16251584

Conceptualizing and identifying cumulative adversity and protective resources: implications for understanding health inequalities.

Stephani L Hatch
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This article focuses on cumulative adversity and protective resources, both social and biological, that interrupt or deflect individuals from optimal life-course trajectories and contribute to widening gaps in health. Under the guiding framework of cumulative adversity and/or advantage, this narrative discusses the theoretical framework of cumulative adversity, presents identified sources of cumulative adversity and protective resources, and highlights the utilization of the life-course approach. Numerous social and biological adverse conditions are identified across multiple domains. Utilizing the life-course perspective in identifying early life determinants and the paucity of information regarding identified protective factors are discussed. Understanding health inequalities requires attention paid to heterogeneity in the impact of social statuses as well as sources of cumulative adversity and protective resources within diverging trajectories across the life course. Intervention implications are discussed, and suggestions for future research are made.

Explore related subjects

Disease SusceptibilityHealth PromotionHealth StatusHuman DevelopmentHumansSocial ClassSocial MedicineJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephani L Hatch. 2005. Conceptualizing and identifying cumulative adversity and protective resources: implications for understanding health inequalities.. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb%2F60.special_issue_2.s130

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Herbicide exposure modifies GSTP1 haplotype association to Parkinson onset age: the GenePD Study.

BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms in the glutathione S-transferase pi gene (GSTP1), encoding GSTP1-1, a detoxification enzyme, may increase the risk of Parkinson disease (PD) with exposure to pesticides. Using the GenePD Study sample of familial PD cases, we explored whether GSTP1 polymorphisms were associated with the age at onset of PD symptoms and whether that relation was modified by exposure to herbicides. METHODS: Seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped and tested for association with PD onset age in men in three strata: no exposure to herbicides, residential exposure to herbicides, and occupational exposure to herbicides. Haplotypes were similarly evaluated in stratified analyses. RESULTS: Three SNPs were associated with PD onset age in the group of men occupationally exposed to herbicides. Three additional SNPs had significant trends for the association of PD onset age across the herbicide exposure groups. Haplotype results also provided evidence that the relation between GSTP1 and onset age is modified by herbicide exposure. One haplotype was associated with an approximately 8-years-earlier onset in the occupationally exposed group and a 2.8-years-later onset in the nonexposed group. CONCLUSIONS: Herbicide exposure may be an effect modifier of the relation between glutathione S-transferase pi gene polymorphisms and onset age in familial PD.

Disease Susceptibility↗
PubMed2006

The neuropeptide genes TAC1, TAC3, TAC4, VIP and PACAP(ADCYAP1), and susceptibility to multiple sclerosis.

The related immunomodulatory neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylyl cyclase activating peptide (PACAP; gene symbol ADCYAP1) have recently been proposed as novel therapeutics for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). These neuropeptides, as well as those belonging to the tachykinin family exert pleiotropic effects, many of which are of relevance to central nervous system inflammation. In the present study, we have analysed 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 4 microsatellite markers in the VIP, ADCYAP1, TAC3 and TAC4 genes for susceptibility to MS in a case-control collection from Northern Ireland. Following correction for multiple comparisons, we did not find any significant associations between single polymorphic markers or multiple-marker haplotypes and susceptibility to MS. Furthermore, we analysed 2 SNPs in the TAC1 gene in a set of Sardinian trio MS families, based on our previous observation of association of these SNPs with MS in the Northern Irish (Genes Immun. 2005, 6, 265-270). Analysis of these SNPs in the Sardinians was not significant though a similar trend to that originally observed in the Northern Irish was present. Meta-analysis of the Sardinian and Northern Irish TAC1 SNP genotype data revealed a Mantel-Haenszel Common OR Estimate for the TAC1 intron 1 SNP rs2072100 of 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92; P=0.005; A allele) and for the TAC1 promoter SNP rs7793277 of 0.76 (95% CI 0.615-0.95; P=0.014; C allele). Our data advocate a need for further exploration of the TAC1 gene region in MS.

Disease Susceptibility↗
PubMed2006

Smoking during pregnancy: subsequent effects on offspring immune competence and disease vulnerability in later life.

About 1 million babies are born each year after prenatal cigarette smoke (CS) exposure from maternal smoking which does not include involuntary maternal exposure to passive smoke. While past emphasis has been on immediately obvious perinatal consequences (e.g., preterm delivery, and low birthweight), smoking during pregnancy has recently emerged as a possible risk factor for later onset disease outcomes in the prenatally exposed offspring. This review brings together those epidemiologic and toxicologic studies demonstrating a link between prenatal CS exposure and subsequent disease vulnerabilities in the progeny. While disorders such as obesity, and type 2 diabetes are included in this category, this paper focuses on two immunologically-related outcomes, cancer and asthma. The review defines the current state of knowledge in this understudied area of children's health, sheds light on the seriousness of such disease vulnerabilities, and reveals gaps that need to be filled to provide a better understanding of the extent and nature of the problem.

Disease Susceptibility↗