PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16251946

Human dynamics: Darwin and Einstein correspondence patterns.

Abstract

In an era when letters were the main means of exchanging scientific ideas and results, Charles Darwin (1809-82) and Albert Einstein (1879-1955) were notably prolific correspondents. But did their patterns of communication differ from those associated with the instant-access e-mail of modern times? Here we show that, although the means have changed, the communication dynamics have not: Darwin's and Einstein's patterns of correspondence and today's electronic exchanges follow the same scaling laws. However, the response times of their surface-mail communication is described by a different scaling exponent from e-mail communication, providing evidence for a new class of phenomena in human dynamics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

João Gama Oliveira, Albert-László Barabási. 2005-10-27. Human dynamics: Darwin and Einstein correspondence patterns.. https://doi.org/10.1038/4371251a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A survey of general dental practitioners' opinions of response letters received from hospital specialists following a referred patient's first appointment.

OBJECTIVES: To discover what dentists require of a hospital response letter with regards to content and timeliness. DESIGN: Postal survey. SETTING: South Wales. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A postal questionnaire was issued to all dentists (n = 256) who had referred a patient to the dental hospital between 1 January 2003 and 1 March 2003. RESULTS: The response rate was 60.2% (154). The preferred time frame for the receipt of a letter following a patient's appointment was one to three weeks for 96.4% (n = 133) of respondents, but 58.4% believed that they currently do not receive responses within this time frame. The preferred method of communication remained the letter (n = 82, 53%), followed by the telephone (n = 58, 38%). E-mail accounted for eight percent (n = 12) of communication. Most respondents (70%, n = 107) were satisfied with the letters' content. Eight of the ten items of information suggested as being appropriate in a response letter were considered essential by 53.2% of dentists (n = 82), and 55.8% (n = 76) believed the remaining two items to be desirable. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists agree closely on the information required in a response letter and most are satisfied with the content of current response letters. However, many dentists believe response letters arrive later than three weeks after their patient's appointment.

Correspondence as Topic↗

Letters or lectures?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Correspondence as Topic↗