PubMed · 16295813
Biological age--a concept whose time has come: a preliminary study.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Chronology poorly predicts biological age (BA) or physiologic reserve (PR). An objective approach to the heterogeneity of aging would greatly help clinical decision making in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first pilot study evaluated 130 "healthy" volunteers, ages 70 to 95 years. A summary BA/PR index was developed, using measures of endurance, strength, flexibility, balance, cognition, depression, comorbidity, and exercise. The second study applied the BA/PR concept to prediction of death after a first elective coronary artery bypass graft, using a Veterans Administration database. RESULTS: The BA/PR index was a better predictor of 3-year functional outcomes and death than was chronological age. In the coronary artery bypass graft study, the inclusion of BA/PR variables significantly improved prediction of 6-month and long-term death for Veterans Administration patients. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of a biological age (BA/PR) approach in predicting outcomes in the elderly was supported. Needed research should develop tools for routine "tracking" of the aging process.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jacqueline Goffaux, Gottlieb C Friesinger, Warren Lambert, Laurie W Shroyer, Thomas E Moritz, Martin McCarthy, William G Henderson, Karl E Hammermeister. 2005. Biological age--a concept whose time has come: a preliminary study.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.smj.0000182178.22607.47
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.