PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16303352

The truth about compliance.

Abstract

When confronted with an adverse response to contact lens wear, practitioners are often quick to 'blame the victim'. Although patient compliance may well be lacking, the reasons for this need to be considered carefully, along with all of the other possible contributing factors, if the safety of contact lens wear is to be improved. This Presidential Address briefly reviews what the contact lens literature has revealed about patient compliance in the context of what has been known for many years in general eye care and, indeed, general medicine. Essentially, compliance with contact lens systems is poor (40-90% of patients are noncompliant) and difficult to predict in individual patients. Neither a compliance-enhancement strategy (intense education) nor reduction of the cost of goods has any significant effect upon the level of compliance. Assessment of personality is not a reliable compliance predictor. A compliance enhancement model is proposed which encompasses the following four components: (a) the clinic and the practitioner, (b) the patient, (c) the advice that is given, and (d) the contact lens industry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Efron. 1997. The truth about compliance.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1367-0484(97)80002-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Challenges of Using Circulating Tumour DNA: Insights from Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Precision oncology relies on integrating tumour fraction, variant allele frequency, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential assessment, pathogenicity, and clinical context into next-generation sequencing interpretation, enabling biologically informed and clinically meaningful treatment decisions while reducing the risk of overinterpreting nontumour or nonactionable genomic alterations.

Editorial↗