PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1633727

Influence of different cell extraction methods on cytometric features.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of different cell extraction procedures on relative nuclear DNA content (IOD), nuclear area, and texture features of Feulgen-stained nuclei. In imprints and smears of fine-needle aspirates and suspensions from one human liver specimen, 50 diploid, 50 tetraploid, and 25 octaploid nuclei were measured from each slide. In addition, for DNA measurements, the progressive mean of IOD and tetraploid/diploid and octaploid/diploid ratios was calculated. The results show that the progressive mean of the IOD is constant after measuring 25-30 nuclei. For the three types of specimens, the IOD of diploid nuclei varied slightly. The average coefficient of variation was about 5% for the fine-needle aspirates, imprints, and suspensions. For all tissue sampling methods, the 99% confidence limits of the tetraploid/diploid ratio and octaploid/diploid ratio were within the range of 1.9-2.1 and 3.7-4.3, respectively. The nuclear area and most of the texture features showed a significant difference (p less than 0.01) between the three sampling methods in all nuclear populations. In conclusion, different tissue sampling methods have little or no effect on DNA-related IOD measurements, whereas the outcome of nuclear area and texture features is very dependent of the cell extraction procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F B Thunnissen, H Perdaen, J Forrest. 1992. Influence of different cell extraction methods on cytometric features.. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990130506

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗