PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1634029

Doctors' interviewing technique and its response to different booking time.

Abstract

There is a burgeoning literature on communication in general practice. It is often assumed that trained GPs know and practice the techniques described, but that time is a major constraint. In two experimental studies patients were given shorter or longer appointments, and the doctors' use of different verbal interventions was measured. Our analysis focused on how individual doctors varied in their use of interviewing techniques according to the time available. When more time was available some interventions were used more frequently by all doctors, but for other interventions the response was variable. For example, GPs who normally used facilitation frequently used it more often when greater time was available, whereas doctors who used this technique less frequently tended not to change when more time was available. This suggests that, at least in the short term, there is a differential response to changes in the time available in the consultation, with increased time being a necessary but not sufficient condition to promote the greater use of the communication techniques which doctors use less frequently.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Ridsdale, M Morgan, R Morris. 1992. Doctors' interviewing technique and its response to different booking time.. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F9.1.57

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗