PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16343682

HCV virological assessment.

Abstract

Virological assessment of HCV infection relies on a series of assays that are essential for diagnostic purposes and to adopt therapeutic decisions. Diagnostic assays can be classified in three groups: assays that are designed to detect specific antibodies to HCV; techniques that detect and quantify viral load; and tests aimed at determining the infecting HCV type. In general, the use of these assays is similar in HCV infected patients as in those co-infected with HCV and HIV. Co-infected patients, however, have some inherent characteristics (deficient immune status, high HCV-RNA concentrations, particular genotype distribution, low response to antiviral therapy) that make the interpretation of such assays slightly different. Regarding assays to detect antibodies to HCV, last generation tests have a similar sensitivity in mono-infected and co-infected individuals. HCV-RNA testing might be helpful in anti-HCV negative individuals with clinical or analytical suspicion of liver disease. Genotype determination in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV should be performed by methods relying on sequence analysis, since serotyping assays have shown a lower sensitivity in co-infected cohorts. HCV-RNA concentration is a strong predictor of response to therapy. Due to the higher viral load of co-infected patients compared to HCV mono-infected individuals, those assays with a wide dynamic range seem more appropriate to monitor viral load during treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xavier Forns, Josep Costa. 2005-11-22. HCV virological assessment.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hepatitis C Virus Enhances Lysosome-Associated Membrane Protein 2 A Transcription Through Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 to Support Viral Replication.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) establishes persistent infection by rewiring host stress-response pathways. Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) contributes to HCV replication, but it remains unclear whether HCV regulates lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 A (LAMP-2A), the rate-limiting receptor for CMA. Here, we examined LAMP-2A regulation in HCV-infected Huh-7.5 cells. HCV infection increased LAMP-2A promoter activity, mRNA, and protein abundance, indicating transcriptional upregulation. Among candidate stress-responsive transcription factors, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), and nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFAT1) were elevated in infected cells. However, promoter mutagenesis identified NRF2 as the principal direct regulator. Mutation of the NRF2-responsive antioxidant response element markedly reduced basal and HCV-induced LAMP-2A promoter activity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed NRF2 association with the LAMP-2A promoter, and HCV infection increased nuclear accumulation and Ser40 phosphorylation of NRF2. Functionally, shRNA-mediated knockdown of LAMP-2A reduced intracellular HCV RNA and protein levels. These findings identify an NRF2-LAMP-2A regulatory axis engaged during HCV infection and support a model in which HCV upregulates LAMP-2A to establish a cellular environment favorable for viral replication.

Hepacivirus↗

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA.

BACKGROUND: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of HCV RNA has recently been introduced. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. STUDY DESIGN: Accuracy, linearity, interassay and intra-assay variations were determined, and a total of 243 routine clinical samples were investigated. RESULTS: When accuracy of the new assay was tested, the majority of results were found to be within +/-0.5 log(10) unit of the results obtained by reference laboratories. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve up to 1.0 x 10(6)IU/ml. The interassay variation ranged from 15% to 32%, and the intra-assay variation ranged from 5% to 8%. When clinical samples were tested by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay and the results were compared with those obtained by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test, the results for 93% of all samples with positive results by both tests were found to be within +/-1.0 log(10) unit. The viral loads for all patients measured by the Abbott and Roche assays showed a high correlation (R(2)=0.93); quantitative results obtained by the Abbott assay were found to be lower than those obtained by the Roche assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory. The time to results was similar for both of the assays.

Hepacivirus↗