PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16356926

Developing a programmed restriction endonuclease for highly specific DNA cleavage.

Kristin Eisenschmidt·Thomas Lanio·András Simoncsits·Albert Jeltsch·Vera Pingoud·Wolfgang Wende·Alfred Pingoud
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Specific cleavage of large DNA molecules at few sites, necessary for the analysis of genomic DNA or for targeting individual genes in complex genomes, requires endonucleases of extremely high specificity. Restriction endonucleases (REase) that recognize DNA sequences of 4-8 bp are not sufficiently specific for this purpose. In principle, the specificity of REases can be extended by fusion to sequence recognition modules, e.g. specific DNA-binding domains or triple-helix forming oligonucleotides (TFO). We have chosen to extend the specificity of REases using TFOs, given the combinatorial flexibility this fusion offers in addressing a short, yet precisely recognized restriction site next to a defined triple-helix forming site (TFS). We demonstrate here that the single chain variant of PvuII (scPvuII) covalently coupled via the bifunctional cross-linker N-(gamma-maleimidobutryloxy) succinimide ester to a TFO (5'-NH2-[CH2](6 or 12)-MPMPMPMPMPPPPPPT-3', with M being 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine and P being 5-[1-propynyl]-2'-deoxyuridine), cleaves DNA specifically at the recognition site of PvuII (CAGCTG) if located in a distance of approximately one helical turn to a TFS (underlined) complementary to the TFO ('addressed' site: 5'-TTTTTTTCTCTCTCTCN(approximately 10)CAGCTG-3'), leaving 'unaddressed' PvuII sites intact. The preference for cleavage of an 'addressed' compared to an 'unaddressed' site is >1000-fold, if the cleavage reaction is initiated by addition of Mg2+ ions after preincubation of scPvuII-TFO and substrate in the absence of Mg2+ ions to allow triple-helix formation before DNA cleavage. Single base pair substitutions in the TFS prevent addressed DNA cleavage by scPvuII-TFO.

Explore related subjects

Cross-Linking ReagentsDNADeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificOligonucleotidesSubstrate SpecificitySuccinimidesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kristin Eisenschmidt, Thomas Lanio, András Simoncsits, Albert Jeltsch, Vera Pingoud, Wolfgang Wende, Alfred Pingoud. 2005-12-14. Developing a programmed restriction endonuclease for highly specific DNA cleavage.. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar%2Fgki1009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

To cleave or not to cleave: a systemic evaluation of DSS versus DSSO for cross-linking mass spectrometry analysis.

Cross-linking mass spectrometry is a powerful method for structural analysis, but choosing between cleavable and non-cleavable cross-linkers remains challenging. We rigorously compared non-cleavable DSS with cleavable DSSO and found that DSS consistently yields more cross-link identifications from isolated protein complexes to bacterial lysates. The advantage of DSS diminishes as sample complexity increases. At the highest complexity tested-human cell lysate-the trend reverses, with DSSO outperforming DSS. The superior performance of DSS in less complex samples is likely explained by its longer and more flexible spacer arm, which interrogates a spatial volume >40% larger than that of DSSO. For both cross-linkers, the number of identified cross-links decreases as the search space expands, but more steeply for DSS. This sharper decline arises from DSS cross-links producing slightly lower fragment ion coverage, not from the absence of signature ions that could reduce search space. Fragment ion coverage is key to interactome mapping: when coverage reaches 85% or above, identification sensitivity hardly decreases as the search space expands, regardless of the cross-linker used. In summary, we recommend DSS for samples no more complex than bacterial lysates. For interactome mapping of mammalian cells, although DSSO outperforms DSS, neither achieves deep interactome coverage.

Cross-Linking Reagents↗
PubMed2007

Microstructural and tensile properties of elastin-based polypeptides crosslinked with genipin and pyrroloquinoline quinone.

Elastin is an elastomeric, self-assembling extracellular matrix protein with potential for use in biomaterials applications. Here, we compare the microstructural and tensile properties of the elastin-based recombinant polypeptide (EP) EP20-244 crosslinked with either genipin (GP) or pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ). Recombinant EP-based sheets were produced via coacervation and subsequent crosslinking. The micron-scale topography of the GP-crosslinked sheets examined with atomic force microscopy revealed the presence of extensive mottling compared with that of the PQQ-crosslinked sheets, which were comparatively smoother. Confocal microscopy showed that the subsurface porosity in the GP-crosslinked sheets was much more open. GP-crosslinked EP-based sheets exhibited significantly greater tensile strength (P < or = 0.05). Mechanistically, GP appears to yield a higher crosslink density than PQQ, likely due to its capacity to form short-range and long-range crosslinks. In conclusion, GP is able to strongly modulate the microstructural and mechanical properties of elastin-based polypeptide biomaterials forming membranes with mechanical properties similar to native insoluble elastin.

Cross-Linking Reagents↗
PubMed2007

Association of protein biogenesis factors at the yeast ribosomal tunnel exit is affected by the translational status and nascent polypeptide sequence.

Ribosome-associated protein biogenesis factors (RPBs) act during a short but critical period of protein biogenesis. The action of RPBs starts as soon as a nascent polypeptide becomes accessible from the outside of the ribosome and ends upon termination of translation. In yeast, RPBs include the chaperones Ssb1/2 and ribosome-associated complex, signal recognition particle, nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC), the aminopeptidases Map1 and Map2, and the Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferase NatA. Here, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of RPB binding at the yeast ribosomal tunnel exit as a function of translational status and polypeptide sequence. We measured the ratios of RPBs to ribosomes in yeast cells and determined RPB occupation of translating and non-translating ribosomes. The combined results imply a requirement for dynamic and coordinated interactions at the tunnel exit. Exclusively, NAC was associated with the majority of ribosomes regardless of their translational status. All other RPBs occupied only ribosomal subpopulations, binding with increased apparent affinity to randomly translating ribosomes as compared with non-translating ones. Analysis of RPB interaction with homogenous ribosome populations engaged in the translation of specific nascent polypeptides revealed that the affinities of Ssb1/2, NAC, and, as expected, signal recognition particle, were influenced by the amino acid sequence of the nascent polypeptide. Complementary cross-linking data suggest that not only affinity of RPBs to the ribosome but also positioning can be influenced in a nascent polypeptide-dependent manner.

Cross-Linking Reagents↗