PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1636865

Strength testing after third-degree acromioclavicular dislocations.

Abstract

Twenty male patients with a grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocation were evaluated more than 2 years after their injury; the average followup was 4.5 years. Strength testing was performed with a Cybex II dynamometer in three planes evaluating flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction at 60 and 120 deg/sec. Subjective complaints were minor and neither daily activities nor athletic participation were impaired. Objectively, only one patient had tenderness over the acromioclavicular joint. All patients had full motion and negative impingement signs. Strength testing with the Cybex II dynamometer showed no significant difference (P less than 0.05) between the injured and uninjured shoulder for strength in internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, adduction, extension, or flexion at speeds of 60 and 120 deg/sec. This study shows that the strength of the shoulder is not significantly affected by conservative treatment of grade III acromioclavicular dislocations. Conservative treatment results in minimal or no functional deficit. The authors recommend that grade III acromioclavicular dislocations be treated nonoperatively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Tibone, R Sellers, P Tonino. Strength testing after third-degree acromioclavicular dislocations.. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659202000316

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Synovial chondromatosis of the acromioclavicular joint.

A 53-year-old woman presented with swelling of 3 years' duration on the right anterior chest wall. A radiograph showed coarse calcifications around the subclavicular region and erosion of the ipsilateral acromioclavicular joint. Computed tomography also showed calcifications in soft tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor around the clavicle extending to the anterior aspect of chest wall, which had low signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging. The histologic findings were of a hyaline cartilage-like mass consisting of mature chondrocytes and an extracellular matrix. The histologic diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis was made. The present case is unusual in respect of the location and size of the tumor.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Stability of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: biomechanical testing of various surgical techniques in a cadaveric model.

BACKGROUND: Despite reports of excellent results with the Weaver-Dunn coracoacromial ligament transfer, many authors recommend augmenting the transfer with supplemental fixation. The authors of this study sought to determine whether there is a biomechanical basis for this assertion and which augmentative method, if any, most closely restored acromioclavicular motion to normal. HYPOTHESIS: Augmentative coracoclavicular fixation provides better restoration of normal acromioclavicular joint laxity and an increased failure load when compared with the Weaver-Dunn reconstruction alone. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory cadaveric study. METHODS: Native acromioclavicular joint motion was measured using an infrared optical measurement system. Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments were then cut, and 1 of 6 reconstructions was performed: Weaver-Dunn, suture cerclage, and 4 different suture anchors. Acromioclavicular joint motion was reassessed, a cyclic loading test was performed, and the failure load was recorded. RESULTS: After Weaver-Dunn reconstruction, mean anteroposterior laxity increased from 8.8 +/- 2.9 mm in the native state to 41.9 +/- 7.6 mm (P < or = .01), and mean superior laxity increased from 3.1 +/- 1.5 mm to 13.6 +/- 4.4 mm (P < or = .01). Weaver-Dunn reconstructions failed at a lower load (177 +/- 9 N) than all other reconstructions (range, 278-369 N) (P < or = .05). Reconstruction using augmentative fixation allowed less acromioclavicular motion than Weaver-Dunn reconstruction (P < or = .05) but more motion than the native ligaments (P < or = .05). Specifically, mean superior laxity after reconstruction ranged between 6.5 and 9.0 mm compared with the native ligaments (3.1 +/- 1.5 mm) and the Weaver-Dunn reconstructions (13.6 +/- 4.4 mm). Mean anteroposterior laxity after the reconstructions tested ranged between 21.8 and 33.2 mm, compared with the native ligaments (8.8 +/- 2.9 mm) and the Weaver-Dunn reconstructions (41.9 +/- 7.6 mm). CONCLUSION: Although none of the augmentative methods tested restored acromioclavicular stability to normal, all proved superior to the Weaver-Dunn reconstruction alone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that when performing acromioclavicular reconstruction, supplemental fixation should be used because it provides more stability and pull-out strength than the Weaver-Dunn reconstruction alone.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Does scapular elevation accompany glenohumeral abduction in healthy subjects?

INTRODUCTION: Although it is used in clinical practice, there are no data concerning scapular elevation during glenohumeral abduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scapular elevation of 30 healthy volunteers in supine and sitting positions were measured at 90-180 deg of glenohumeral abduction by two examiners. In addition, radiographs of the ten subjects were taken in supine position at 0-180 deg of glenohumeral abduction, and the scapular elevation measurements were repeated. Also, the movements of five anatomical landmarks (acromioclavicular joint, center of glenoid cavity, scapular notch, angulus superior and inferior) were measured with regard to transverse and vertical axes. RESULTS: The values obtained for scapular elevation during 90, 120, 150, and 180 deg of glenohumeral abduction were (mean and SD) 26.63 and 3.96, 31.77 and 4.36, 35.97 and 5.15, 40.10 and 5.18 deg, respectively. There were no significant differences with regard to side, gender, and position of the subject. No correlation was found between the clinical and radiological measurements. Movements of certain points did not reveal progressive upward motion. CONCLUSION: There is no scapular elevation but rather rotation during glenohumeral joint abduction. Normal values given in the present study can be used in clinical examinations.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗