PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16377205

Assessing methods for identifying pair-wise atomic contacts across binding interfaces.

Abstract

An essential step in understanding the molecular basis of protein-protein interactions is the accurate identification of inter-protein contacts. We evaluate a number of common methods used in analyzing protein-protein interfaces: a Voronoi polyhedra-based approach, changes in solvent accessible surface area (DeltaSASA) and various radial cutoffs (closest atom, Cbeta, and centroid). First, we compared the Voronoi polyhedra-based analysis to the DeltaSASA and show that using Voronoi polyhedra finds knob-in-hole contacts. To assess the accuracy between the Voronoi polyhedra-based approach and the various radial cutoff methods, two sets of data were used: a small set of 75 experimental mutants and a larger one of 592 structures of protein-protein interfaces. In an assessment using the small set, the Voronoi polyhedra-based methods, a solvent accessible surface area method, and the closest atom radial method identified 100% of the direct contacts defined by mutagenesis data, but only the Voronoi polyhedra-based method found no false positives. The other radial methods were not able to find all of the direct contacts even using a cutoff of 9A. With the larger set of structures, we compared the overall number contacts using the Voronoi polyhedra-based method as a standard. All the radial methods using a 6-A cutoff identified more interactions, but these putative contacts included many false positives as well as missed many false negatives. While radial cutoffs are quicker to calculate as well as to implement, this result highlights why radial cutoff methods do not have the proper resolution to detail the non-homogeneous packing within protein interfaces, and suggests an inappropriate bias in pair-wise contact potentials. Of the radial cutoff methods, using the closest atom approach exhibits the best approximation to the more intensive Voronoi calculation. Our version of the Voronoi polyhedra-based method QContacts is available at .

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tiffany B Fischer, J Bradley Holmes, Ian R Miller, Jerod R Parsons, Leon Tung, James C Hu, Jerry Tsai. 2005-12-07. Assessing methods for identifying pair-wise atomic contacts across binding interfaces.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2005.11.005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

ProteoParc: A Reference Protein Database Builder for Ancient and Nonmodel Organisms.

Over the past few years, the increasing interest in analyzing the proteome of extinct and nonmodel organisms has generated a new field of research expanding the scope of proteomics. The lack of curated databases and/or molecular data from these organisms forces researchers to manually search in different public repositories for related protein sequences, either for MS/MS peptide identification or ZooMS marker annotation. This can lead to format incongruences and hinder reproducibility between studies. To address this issue, we introduce ProteoParc, a user-friendly software that builds reference databases by systematically downloading and processing protein sequences from the most widely used public repositories. The pipeline's output is a nonredundant protein database, formatted in a way to be interpreted by typical peptide identification software. Moreover, the user can adjust the database dimension and composition by applying different criteria to include only a certain number of genes or species. Thus, ProteoParc is an easy and fast, custom-made bioinformatic tool useful for future paleoproteomics analysis in ancient samples related to understudied organisms.

Databases, Protein↗

Assessing Metal Ion Assignment Accuracy in Protein Data Bank Models via Elemental Spectroscopy.

Accurate representation of metal ions in macromolecular structures is critical for chemical interpretation, computational modeling, and machine-learning methods that rely on Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries. However, the elemental identity of metals modeled in crystallographic structures is often inferred indirectly and rarely validated experimentally. Here, we combine Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) and X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRFS) to determine the elemental composition of protein samples used to generate 70 deposited metalloprotein crystal structures. By analyzing the original protein material employed for crystallization, but before the addition of crystallization buffer solutions, we assess whether the modeled metal ions in deposited structures are consistent with experimentally detectable elemental content. We find that in a majority of cases, the metals modeled in the corresponding PDB entries are inconsistent with the metals present in the protein samples before crystallization, or that additional metals are present but not represented in the structural models. Spectroscopic results were integrated with automated crystallographic validation metrics, including real-space Z-difference (RSZD) analysis and systematic rerefinement, to evaluate atomic-number mismatch at metal sites. PIXE and XRFS show strong agreement for dominant elemental signals and provide complementary, scalable approaches for identifying suspect metal assignments. This work does not address physiological or functional metalation but instead highlights a widespread data integrity issue in deposited macromolecular structures, PDB-wide. These results establish an experimentally corroborated link between elemental identity and crystallographic validation metrics, enabling the large-scale detection of chemically inconsistent annotations in structural databases used for computational modeling and machine learning.

Databases, Protein↗

BAV-LLPS: a database of bacterial, archaea, and virus liquid-liquid phase separation proteins.

MOTIVATION: Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a key process underlying the formation of biomolecular condensates, such as membrane-less organelles, that compartmentalize biochemical processes inside the cells. While LLPS has been extensively studied in eukaryotes, its role in bacteria, archaea, and viruses remains far less characterized. Recent studies in bacteria have revealed that LLPS-driven condensates play critical roles in RNA processing, stress response, and pathogenicity. Similarly, many viruses exploit LLPS to facilitate crucial steps in their infection cycles, including viral entry, genome replication, assembly, and host immune evasion. RESULTS: In this work, we introduce a hand-curated database of LLPS proteins from bacteria, archaea, and viruses (BAV-LLPS Database). This resource, extended through sequence similarity searches, comprises over 5000 proteins and integrates diverse data including biological annotations, sequence features, predicted disordered regions, LLPS per site probability, and AlphaFold2-based structural models. Additionally, our web server enables users to explore both the curated and homologous derived datasets, providing a platform to uncover evolutionary relationships and intrinsic and differential properties of LLPS proteins across various taxonomic groups. This work seeks to deepen our understanding of LLPS mechanisms beyond eukaryotic organisms, emphasizing their significance across diverse life forms. It also aims to foster the development of specialized predictive tools that will facilitate the exploration and characterization of LLPS processes in a wide array of living organisms, thereby contributing to advancements in both fundamental biological research and applied biomedical sciences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BAV-LLPS DB is freely accessible at https://bav-llps-db.bioinformatica.org/. The data can be retrieved from the website. The source code of the database can be downloaded from https://bav-llps-db.bioinformatica.org/download.

Databases, Protein↗