PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16381229

[Viral hepatitis: Croatian consensus statement].

Abstract

There has been a dramatic improvement in diagnostic procedures and therapy of viral hepatitis in the last 20 years. Improvements in therapy caused an increase in actual cost, however, with significant long-term savings through a decreased cost of treatment of advanced liver disease including liver transplantation. The Croatian National Board for Viral Hepatitis has decided to initiate the organization of consensus conference on viral hepatitis enabling the leading experts in the country to give the best possible recommendations for the diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapy in our circumstances. The Consensus Conference took place in Zagreb in June 2004, with update in March 2005, organized by the Croatian National Board for Viral Hepatitis, Reference Centers of the Ministry of Health for Chronic Liver Diseases, Infectious Diseases and AIDS, Croatian Society of Gastroenterology--Hepatology Section, Croatian Society for Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, and Croatian Institute for Health Insurance. Invited experts provided written reports on the respective subjects that appear in this issue and their recommendations resulting in this consensus statement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boris Vucelić, Irena Hrstić, Josip Begovac, Nikola Bradarić, Vitomir Burek, Vesna Colić-Cvrlje, Marko Duvnjak, Alemka Jaklin Kekez, Petar Kes, Vladimira Lesnikar, Stjepan Mise, Miro Morović, Ranko Ostojić, Ivica Pavić, Davor Stimac, Aleksandar Vcev, Adriana Vince. 2005. [Viral hepatitis: Croatian consensus statement].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16381229/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗