PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1638820

Office hysteroscopy.

Abstract

Most operative office surgery can be done easily. If, midway through a procedure in the office, the operator finds that a myoma is too large or deep to resect safely in the office, the procedure can be terminated and rescheduled for the operating room. Polyps, retained products, and the lost intrauterine device all can be treated similarly. With the proper equipment and patient selection, the well-trained hysteroscopist can do extensive operative hysteroscopy in the office. With experience, the hysteroscopist can do diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy at the same time, resulting in a substantial savings of both cost and time for the patient and the physician. The future of office hysteroscopy may include endometrial ablation and transcervical sterilization, in addition to the procedures described in this chapter. Diagnostic hysteroscopy is becoming a standard part of office gynecology. With continued training, operative hysteroscopy will move into the realm of office gynecology at the same level as diagnostic hysteroscopy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Gimpelson. 1992. Office hysteroscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1638820/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗