PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16398624

Effective shade structures.

David J Turnbull·Alfio V Parisi
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Research shows that a large proportion of shade structures provide insufficient protection against the sun's ultraviolet light. Shade creation guidelines need to be updated. Community organisations such as child care centres and schools that need to provide effective shade are hindered by cost and building regulations. The protective function of shade structures is more important than their aesthetic appeal.

Explore related subjects

Environment DesignEnvironmental ExposureHumansRadiation ProtectionSkin NeoplasmsUltraviolet RaysJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David J Turnbull, Alfio V Parisi. 2006-01-02. Effective shade structures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16398624/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Sampling challenges posed by continental-scale soil landscape modeling.

Limited research exists to guide the development of continental-scale field sampling approaches. We developed a method to compare different sampling schemes designed for continental-scale environmental analysis. Using simulated annealing, we produced hypothetical soil property surfaces for the conterminous United States. The surfaces exhibited varying degrees of polygonality and conditioning by existing soil datasets. Differences in mean between a gridded sample and a polygon-centered sample were evaluated using randomization and other statistical tests. We saw a weak evidence in support of the hypothesis that if a polygonal structure exists in a surface being sampled, then it should be utilized during the actual sampling routine. We saw a somewhat stronger evidence for the hypothesis that differences in local sample density across a continental trend surface can lead to significant sampling bias. Ultimately, the success of different sampling strategies designed for use in continental-scale environmental analysis will largely depend on the ability to anticipate the spatial variability of the variable being measured.

Environment Design↗
PubMed2006

People, places...and other people? Integrating understanding of intrapersonal, social and environmental determinants of physical activity.

"People or places: what should be the target?" was the provocative title of a keynote session at the fifth Australian National Physical Activity Conference held in Melbourne in 2005. This paper will argue that in fact there need not be major conflict between these views, and that couching recent debate about physical activity promotion as a polarised choice between these presents a false dichotomy. To illustrate this, the paper will consider several problems with singular approaches to understanding and promoting physical activity, and will then describe emerging empirical evidence on the nexus between people and places. To balance an increasing emphasis in the scientific literature on physical environmental determinants of physical activity, the role of intrapersonal and social factors will also be revisited. It is concluded that growing evidence supporting the multiple domains of influence on physical activity justifies calls for multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral partnerships and approaches to the promotion of active lifestyles.

Environment Design↗
PubMed2006

Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects: systematic review.

AIM: This paper reports a systematic review to determine the effects of physical environmental stimuli in healthcare settings on the health and well-being of patients. BACKGROUND: The concept of healing environments suggests that the physical environment of the healthcare setting can encourage the healing process and patients' feelings of well-being. Understanding the effects of physical environmental stimuli will allow us to design healthcare environments that generate these potential health benefits. METHOD: A search was conducted using the MedLine, PsychInfo, Embase, CINAHL, Iconda, ScienceDirect, Compendex and the ISI Citation Indexes databases. Studies were included if they concerned interventions involving health effects of environmental stimuli in healthcare settings on patients, and were based on controlled clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals. Both clinical and psychological outcome measures were included. The search was completed in 2005. FINDINGS: Of the over 500 potentially relevant studies identified, only 30 met all criteria and were included in this review. Predominantly positive effects were found for sunlight, windows, odour and seating arrangements. Inconsistent effects were found for sound, nature, spatial layout, television and multiple stimuli interventions. In general, both the size and direction of effects seem highly dependent on characteristics of patient populations and healthcare settings. CONCLUSIONS: Studies that manipulate several environmental stimuli simultaneously clearly support the general notion that the physical healthcare environment affects the well-being of patients. However, when scrutinizing the effects of specific environmental stimuli, conclusive evidence is still very limited and difficult to generalize. The field thus appears to be in urgent need of well-conducted, controlled clinical trials. At present, and on the basis of the available research, it would be premature to formulate evidence-based guidelines for designing healthcare environments.

Environment Design↗